Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 2754 (1.04 seconds)

Inquiry Act, 1932 to inquire into allegations of corruption, favouritism and nepotism against the Chief Minister of a State-Suit ... legal right depends. A memorandum alleging corruption, favouritism and nepotism against the Chief Minister of the State of Karnataka
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 127 - Cited by 213 -
1978 AIR 68
- G C.
decision of the Tribunal in the case of Favourite Food Products Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise ... Stay Application, the Tribunal observed that the Tribunal in Favourite Food Products v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Rajkot (supra
Gujarat High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 5 - D M H.N.Devani,&Nbsp;
respondents, the Corporation was guilty of showing partiality and favouritism to the rival intervening unions attempting to organising their employees ... cannot be held that the appellant Corporation showed favouritism or partisan attitude towards the intervening union, Item
Bombay High Court
- Cites 23 - Cited by 3 -
1986 (1) BomCR 126
- H Patel
upon the claimants to show that there was any favouritism or partiality shown to one set of workers regardless ... facts of the case. There was no discrimination, favouritism or partiality whatsoever in any manner. Those who are covered
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - A Pasayat
accorded, a spate of complaints containing allegations of favouritism, nepotism, corruption and mal- practices with regard to the selection process ... close touch with him for long..... The allegation of favouritism was further confirm by DIG Sri Shahid Ahmed
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 32 - Cited by 2 -
(1998) 3 UPLBEC 2347
- O Garg
nature, which was executed by the appellant and that favouritism was shown by the respondent No. 2 in favour ... appellant that the respondent No. 2 has shown favouritism in favour of respondent No. 3 by issuing Letter of Intent
Gujarat High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 1 - P Majmudar
Calcutta High Court Ganapati Apartments Pvt. Ltd. vs Favourite Small Investment Ltd. on 8 March, 2002 Equivalent citations
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 1 -
(2002) 3 CALLT 108 HC
- A Lala
injunction restraining the defendant from using the name "Officers Favourite" in relation to alcoholic beverages in any manner ... injunction restraining the respondent from using the name "Officers Favourite" in relation to alcoholic beverages which is similar
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 -
2002 (25) PTC 704 Karn
- M Mirdhe
petitioner had not acted in a manner to show favouritism to the contractor as falsely alleged by the Management. According ... then and there, but there is no proof of favouritism or misuse of the Office. Ultimately, it was found that
Madras High Court
- Cites 21 - Cited by 0
Calcutta High Court Favourite Merchants Pvt. Ltd. & ... vs Unknown on 22 June, 2010 Author: I. P. Mukerji ... CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF : FAVOURITE MERCHANTS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Ms. Lopita Banerjee
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - I P Mukerji
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next