1 - 10 of 2171 (1.24 seconds)
FR.22(I)(a)(2)] instead of Fundamental Rule 22-C
[FR.22-C], was valid. By the same judgment ... FR.22(I)(a)(2), read
thus:-
"F.R.22-C.- Notwithstanding anything contained in these Rules, where
Supreme Court of India
Junior Engineer (Grade I) would be
fixed under FR 22-C.
The C.P.W.D Junior Engineers Association entered ... fixed for Junior Engineer (Grade I) under
FR 22-C was waived. It was agreed inter alia (a) that there
Supreme Court of India
terms of the
precisions of the erstwhile FR 22-C ... became
due, which is what is exactly prescribed under FR 22 (I) (a) (1). We,
therefore, cannot find any fault
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore
dated 4.02.1966, as a result of application of FR 22-C [ later ... directly as a result of the application of FR 22-C. For example, if even in the lower post
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi
Shri Subhash Chander, Director (SR) initially under FR 22(1) (a)(2) w.e.f. 09.06.2001 at Rs.13125/- with ... drawn by him in the lower post under FR 22-C and he is likely to get more pay than
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi
done by the Post Master, Head Office, Palai
under FR 22(C) was an inflation ... scale
of Rs.1400-2300 his pay fixed under FR 22(C) is irregular as it is pointed
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
retiral benefits due to
fixation of pay under FR 22-C.
2 The brief facts are as follows. The applicant ... after 1.4.87 were given the benefit of fixation under FR 22-C.
This was upheld by the High Court
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
lower rate they made representations under FR
22-C seeking parity of their pay with that of Respondent ... step up the pay of the contesting respondents under FR
22-C; but as regards the arrears
Supreme Court of India
were ignorant of the amended
provisions of the FR.22-C and it is their inaction, negligence and
carelessness which ... Department came to
know of the amendment in FR. 22-C. That apart, it also appears from
the record produced
Gujarat High Court
Petitioner represented but this yielded no results.
Invoking FR 22-C the Petitioner states that his pay should have been ... respect of
W.P. (C) 3191/1993 Page 3 of 5
personal pay under FR 22 (a) (ii) when
Delhi High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -