1 - 10 of 2373 (1.41 seconds)
High Court, while
holding that FR.22(1)(a)(1) and FR.22(1)(a)(2) would be applicable ... judgment whereby it was held that FR.22(1)(a)(1) and
FR.22(1)(a)(2) would apply
Supreme Court of India
applying FR 22(1)(a)(i) as permitted in
the said order. This was after the respondent opted for this ... whether his claim is justified?
FR 22 reads as follows:
F.R. 22(1): The initial pay of a
Government
Supreme Court of India
accordance with the
provisions of FR 22(1)(a)(2) of the Fundamental Rules. Provision exists for
protection ... provisions of FR 15(a) read with
FR 22(1)(a)(2) and 22(1)(a)(3). These Rules
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
opted to avail
the benefit of pay fixation under FR 22 (1)(a)(i). The posts of Office
Superintendent ... those promoted earlier are entitled for fixation under
FR 22(1)(a)(i). The order dated 24th July, 2006 denying
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
applicant under FR 15
(a) and FR 22 1(a)(1) read with ... under FR 22.
10. According to the applicant the pay should have been fixed under
Rule 22(1
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
another increment under FR.22(1)(a)(i) since their pay was
already fixed under FR ... case upto Kailash Chand Sharma's case, as
under:
(1) The doctrine of prospective overruling can be applied only
Andhra High Court
respondents to grant the benefits
of pay fixation under FR 22 (1)(a)(i) to the applicants
on their promotion ... 2010 regarding extending the benefits of pay
fixation under FR 22 (1)(a)(i) and grant of higher grade
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
opted to avail
the benefit of pay fixation under FR 22 (1)(a)(i). The posts of Office
Superintendent ... those promoted earlier are entitled for fixation under
FR 22(1)(a)(i). The order dated 24th July, 2006 denying
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
applying FR 22(1)(a)(i) as permitted in
the said order. This was after the respondent opted for this ... whether his claim is justified?
FR 22 reads as follows:
F.R. 22(1): The initial pay of a
Government
Supreme Court of India
opted to avail
the benefit of pay fixation under FR 22 (1)(a)(i). The posts of Office
Superintendent ... those promoted earlier are entitled for fixation under
FR 22(1)(a)(i). The order dated 24th July, 2006 denying
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -