1 - 10 of 37019 (2.31 seconds)
that ho did not discharge that burden by merely proving title
coupled with enjoyment at some earlier period. The correct ... entitled to retain possession once
the plaintiff has proved title at some period more than 12 years ago,
it seems
Patna High Court
years of the suit or on the defendants to prove title by
adverse possession. Relying upon the decision of this ... presump-tion of possession arising from
admitted or proved title is not at all available. That decision has
been distinguished
Patna High Court
Specific Relief Act is utilised the plaintiff need not prove
title, and the title of the defendant does not avail ... file. a suit for ejectment pleading and
proving his title to the suit land. A mere possessory suit
after
Supreme Court of India
recover possession from the
appellant TTD unless the TTD proved title. The learned Judge
held that the oral evidence adduced ... liable to be
dismissed as the TTD had proved titled and the said title
was subsisting and was never extinguished
Supreme Court of India
judgment be maintained that a person who proves title in a suit for
ejectment has the right to the decree ... upon the adverse possessor. Accordingly
when the holder of title proves, as in their Lordships' view he does
with some
Madras High Court
instance held that the plaintiff had failed to
prove both title and possession and dismissed the suit. The learned
District ... Judge on appeal found that plaintiff's title was proved, but
that he failed to prove possession within 12 years
Calcutta High Court
been established but that they have failed to prove
their title with regard to plot No. 43. On the question ... that he did not discharge
his burden by merely proving title coupled with enjoyment at some
earlier period
Patna High Court
entitled for declaration in absence of production of original title deeds when the plaintiffs have discharged the burden ... justified in holding that the Sangam did not prove its title over the suit property ignoring the revenue records
Madras High Court
burden is on the
appellants/plaintiffs to prove title and in the light of the non-discharge of
such burden ... part of the
appellants/plaintiffs to establish the title by proving Ex.A-5 at least by
examining the mother
Andhra High Court
club and its office bearers
have failed to prove their title in the suit property by way of adverse possession ... appellants' suit as his clients asserted
and proved their title and possession in respect of the suit property
Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -