Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 20787 (3.72 seconds)

Central Government Act Section 45 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 45. Opinions of experts.- When the Court
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 289
1531/2004 under Sec.45 of the Indian Evidence Act to direct the handwriting and finger print expert described ... take out an application under Sec.45 of the Indian Evidence Act as the onus is only on the plaintiff
Madras High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
Calcutta High Court Mahmudabad Properties (P.) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 27 July
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 31 - Cited by 1 -
1972 85 ITR 500 Cal
- T Basu - Full Document
Karnataka High Court Synchron Machine Tools P. Ltd. And ... vs U.M. Suresh Rao on
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 44 - Cited by 1 -
1994 79 CompCas 868 Kar
- K Swami - Full Document
expert in terms of Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act available who could be in a position to offer ... proceedings as per Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act reads thus
Madras High Court
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Thus, his main submission is that Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act is the substantive law, whereas Order XXVI ... XXVI Rule 10-A read with Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act. It is his main submission that
Andhra High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Punjab-Haryana High Court S. Iqbal Singh vs S. Gurdas Singh Badal And Ors. on
Punjab-Haryana High Court
- Cites 88 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1973 P H 163
- D Mahajan - Full Document
typewriter expert under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for short "Evidence Act") based on the decision ... fact under Section 45 of the Evidence Act. It is obvious that the Indian Evidence Act when enacted originally
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 8 - Cited by 31 -
1996 AIR 1491
- J Verma. - Full Document
vain attempt to fall back on Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act for contending that the report ... obvious that recourse to Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, in this context, is hardly permissible. It was riot
Punjab-Haryana High Court
- Cites 16 - Cited by 5 -
1982 CriLJ 2138
- S Sandhawalia - Full Document
Andhra High Court Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. ... vs Karedla Suryanarayana And Ors. on 18
Andhra High Court
- Cites 132 - Cited by 1 -
2002 110 CompCas 193 AP
- B Swamy - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next