Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 1035 (1.64 seconds)

Central Government Act Section 99 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 99. Construction of terms.- In a will
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 14
because contrary to the provisions of Section 99 of the Indian Succession Act. It is worthy of remark that ... contrary to the provisions of Section 99 of the Indian Succession Act, which was made applicable to Hindus by Section
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 1 -
(1912) ILR 39 Cal 87
- Mookerjee
Supreme Court of India Samatha vs State Of A.P. And Ors. on 11 July
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 165 - Cited by 46 -
AIR 1997 SC 3297
- K Ramaswamy
rule, recognised in English Law and in Indian Succession Act, Section 99, extended by Hindu Wills Act to Bengal should ... principle peculiar to English Law or to the Indian Succession Act (Section 107). In Hick-ling v. Fair
Madras High Court
- Cites 8 - Cited by 6 -
(1924) 47 MLJ 337
- Ramesam
void as per Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act. 12. Section 99(c) of the Indian Succession Act, reads ... Section 99(c) of the Act and therefore, the appellant cannot be said that he is a nephew. 13. Section
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 -
ILR 1998 KAR 4134
- N Veerabhadraiah
misapplication thereof. 5. Two sections of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, on which the case mainly depends, must ... related to Sections 99, 100, 101 and 102 of the Indian Succession Act (X of 1865) then in force. Section
Bombay High Court
- Cites 10 - Cited by 5 -
(1944) 46 BOMLR 865
- V Maugham
argued in the Court below, whether Section 99 of the Indian Succession Act, which is made applicable to Hindus ... opinion, it is unnecessary to consider the effect of Section 99, first, because neither the rule laid down
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 10 - Cited by 3 -
7 Ind Cas 921
Delhi High Court Raj Kumari Sharma vs Rajinder Nath Dewan And Ors. on 25 March
Delhi High Court
- Cites 45 - Cited by 2 -
AIR 1987 Delhi 323
- S Chadha
Calcutta High Court Amrito Lall Dutt vs Surnomoye Dassee on 9 March, 1897 Equivalent citations
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 1 -
(1897) ILR 24 Cal 589
- Jenkins
invalid by virtue of Section 99 of the Indian Succession Act and the ruling in Dinesh Chandra Roy Chowdhury
Bombay High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 1 -
(1927) 29 BOMLR 1320
- Patkar
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next