1 - 10 of 3634 (1.14 seconds)
expressly chooses to penalise
the servant for misconduct, negligence, inefficiency or the
like by inflicting on him the punishment
Supreme Court of India
Government servant such as on account of
inefficiency or dishonesty...........
On October 30, 1952, the Government of Saurashtra passed ... notice to him of any charge of misconduct or inefficiency
and without any enquiry and was, in consequence, in contra
Supreme Court of India
true that the misconduct, negligence, inefficiency or other
disqualification may be the motive or the inducing factor which
influences ... service is
sought to be founded on misconduct, negligence, inefficiency or
other disqualification, then it is a punishment
Allahabad High Court
necessary in
the public interest on account of inefficiency or dishonesty. This
retirement was challenged on the ground that ... Government to
retire compulsorily on the ground of inefficiency without giving any
opportunity to show cause. The Supreme Court distinguished
Bombay High Court
efficiency bar should be for general bad work and
inefficiency continued over several years ... efficiency bar being prescribed for general bad work and inefficiency
continued over several years. Crossing of the efficiency
Punjab-Haryana High Court
back to
his substantive post because he was found inefficient. As has been
stated in the counter-affidavit, the petitioner ... that most of it is certainly a matter of
inefficiency but there are remarks contained in it, which
Calcutta High Court
case of a member of the Force discharged for
inefficiency the grant of the concession shall be subject ... condition that the Commandant is satisfied that the inefficiency is
not due to willful negligence. This concession shall
Delhi High Court
practically the same, namely, either the
misconduct, or inefficiency or both of that Government servant. But as
observed ... Government servant such as on account
of inefficiency, dishonesty, corruption or infamous conduct."
It is evident that under this proviso
Orissa High Court
that the damage was caused on
account of extreme inefficiency and utter carelessness on the part
of the senior officers ... other officer are personally found
guilty of "complete inefficiency, lack of control, watch and
supervision and utter slackness and dereliction
Bombay High Court
October, 1967, the first
respondent was found to be inefficient in the performance of his duties
which necessitated the issue ... first respondent should be terminated on grounds of inefficiency and
performance of work. It was also submitted that
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -