Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
All
Years
1 - 10 of 93934 (0.58 seconds)

case of XYZ/ABC Equity Fund, (2001) (250 ITR 194) (AAR) and Fidelity Advisors Series VIII ... ITR 1) (AAR), the assessees filed revised returns of income on showing taxable income at ` Nil, and claiming refund
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
behest of the accused, he filed on record his ITR for the year 2013-14 along with balance sheet ... respondent was not shown in the balance sheet and ITR, the appellant could not be said to have proved
Delhi High Court
- Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Sanghi - Full Document
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata Sps Steel & Power Ltd., Kolkata vs Assessee on 30
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
2012. (ii) Rajinder Nath V CIT in 120 ITR 14 (SC). (iii) Consolidated Coffee ... ITR 729 (Kar). The learned CIT (Appeals), however, has distinguished the facts of the assessee's case with the findings
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Delhi High Court Credential Leasing & Credits Ltd. vs Shruti Investments & Anr. on 29
Delhi High Court
- Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - V Sanghi - Full Document
ACIT vs. Bhaumik Colour Pvt. Ltd. (2009) 313 ITR (AT) 146 as well as in the case of assessee ... Income Tax vs. Ankitach(P) Ltd . [(2012) 340 ITR 14]. The Delhi High Court has held that if the assessee
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad
- Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Totagars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. reported in 332 ITR 283. In that view of the matter, the total income ... operative Sale Society Ltd. V. ITO (322 ITR 283) (SC) is applicable to the facts of telecommunication expenses appellant
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
2012 ⦁ CIT vs. Phool Chand Jiwan Ram (131 ITR 17) (Del.) ⦁ CIT vs. Compaq Electric ... Bangalore) ⦁ CIT vs. Chetan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd . (267 ITR 770) (Guj.) ⦁ CIT vs. Tosha International Ltd . (176 Taxman
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Upadhyaya V Shanabha P Patel (166 ITR 163 (SC); CIT vs. Sheo Kumar Debi ... ITR 13 (Pat.) and Jai Hanuman Trading Co. (P) Ltd. vs. CIT 110 ITR 36 (Punj. & Hary.), that where
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur
- Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
case of CIT Vs. Mamta Enterprises reported in 266 ITR 356 which is directly on this issue held that ... Cotton Manufacturing Company Ltd. and others reported in 205 ITR 163. Referring to the above decision
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next