Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
All
Years
1 - 10 of 93528 (0.22 seconds)

United Chemical Agency v. R.K. Singh ITO 97 ITR 14. - N.K. Mohnot v. DCIT ... ITR 275 (Mad.) - Vijay Pahwa Vs. DCIT 254 ITR 354 (Cal); -Sri Venkateshwara Tourist Home (P) Ltd. V. ADIT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi
- Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
well. In India Cements Ltd. vs. CIT [1966] 60 ITR 52 (SC), it was clarified by the apex court that ... Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. [1998] 231 ITR 285 (SC), that the payment or non-payment, as the case
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
- Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
such amount. In Grindlays Bank v CIT, (1992) 193 ITR 457 (Cal) decided on September 5, 1989, it was held ... Coca Cola Beverage P. Ltd. v CIT, (2007) 293 ITR 226 (SC) where the same view was taken. I find
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs. State of Orissa, 83 ITR 26 to contend that penalty should not be imposed. Considering these ... case of Dharmendra Textile Processors Ltd., 306 ITR 277, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that in case of penalty
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs. State of Orissa, 83 ITR 26 to contend that penalty should not be imposed. Considering these ... case of Dharmendra Textile Processors Ltd., 306 ITR 277, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that in case of penalty
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Overseas Private Limited v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: 295 ITR 22 (Bombay), the third proviso to Section ... were:- (i) ITO v. M. K. Mohammed Kunhi: 71 ITR 815 (SC); (ii) Wire Netting Store, Delhi & Another
Delhi High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - B D Ahmed - Full Document
Overseas Private Limited v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: 295 ITR 22 (Bombay), the third proviso to Section ... were:- (i) ITO v. M. K. Mohammed Kunhi: 71 ITR 815 (SC); (ii) Wire Netting Store, Delhi & Another
Delhi High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - B D Ahmed - Full Document
Overseas Private Limited v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: 295 ITR 22 (Bombay), the third proviso to Section ... were:- (i) ITO v. M. K. Mohammed Kunhi: 71 ITR 815 (SC); (ii) Wire Netting Store, Delhi & Another
Delhi High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - B D Ahmed - Full Document
Overseas Private Limited v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: 295 ITR 22 (Bombay), the third proviso to Section ... were:- (i) ITO v. M. K. Mohammed Kunhi: 71 ITR 815 (SC); (ii) Wire Netting Store, Delhi & Another
Delhi High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - B D Ahmed - Full Document
Overseas Private Limited v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: 295 ITR 22 (Bombay), the third proviso to Section ... were:- (i) ITO v. M. K. Mohammed Kunhi: 71 ITR 815 (SC); (ii) Wire Netting Store, Delhi & Another
Delhi High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - B D Ahmed - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next