1 - 10 of 40308 (1.98 seconds)
were charged
were of the same kind and one joint trial of those offenses
was justifiable under s. 234 Code ... Criminal Procedure. A
joint trial of both the appellants for the three offenses
each of which was alleged
Supreme Court of India
Adulteration Act, 1954-Ss. 7, 16 and
19(2)-Joint trial of vendor and distributor of food article-
If legal ... quashed because two
accused were set tip for trial jointly.
HELD : The High Court was right in holding that
Supreme Court of India
them cannot be combined to
validate a joint trial. 'On behalf of the State, it was contended that
the various ... section can be combined to justify a joint
trial and that Sections 234 to 239 can also be combined
Allahabad High Court
transaction, it was just and proper to order a joint trial of the
two causes and whether there was anything ... plaintiff in the suit. A question of joint trial arises when the
rival parties file independent actions but'. based
Supreme Court of India
filed for joint trial of R.C.P.
Nos. 6 and 9 of 1987 along with ... adduced is also different; there is no justification for joint
trial; a joint trial will cause incalculable prejudice and damages
Kerala High Court
matter too it appears to me that the joint trial of the offences under
Section 409 with respect ... particular accused and Section 239 deals with the joint trial
of several persons and not to the joint trial
Allahabad High Court
Chatterji were jointly tried before the
Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, and as a result of the trial the
present appellants ... there had been a misjoinder
or a joint trial of several persons unlawfully the determination of
which was solely dependent
Calcutta High Court
manner, the
power of this Court to older joint trial of all the accused persons,
which ... Magistrate whether he would order separate or joint trial in accordance
with law In case the Magistrate passes a wrong
Delhi High Court
petition of the applicant-accused in writing for
joint trial, as mandatorily enjoined by the proviso to Sub-section ... found to have recorded
his opinion anywhere that such joint trial was not likely to cause
prejudice to the accused
Madhya Pradesh High Court
raised on
behalf of the applicants is that the joint trial of the two accused
persons in respect of each ... claim made in the
suit, and that the joint trial was permissible under Section 239 (a),
Criminal Procedure Code
Bombay High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -