Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
All
71 - 80 of 340 (0.38 seconds)

proved by the second respondent. 44. In K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and another, reported
Gujarat High Court
- Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - D Buch - Full Document
K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Anr., (1999) 7 SCC 510, Kiran Gupta v. State ... K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Anr., (1999) 7 SCC 510; Kiran Gupta v. State
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 64 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document
K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan ; 4. MA. Mohamed Ismail v. State of Tamil Nadu
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi
- Cites 54 - Cited by 0 -
2006 (112) ECC 263
- Full Document
Judgment in the case of K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and also followed by the Madras High Court
Bombay High Court
- Cites 30 - Cited by 0 -
II (2006) BC 278
- V Kanade - Full Document
Ahmednagar. They rely on observations in " K. K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and another ... been laid down in case of "K. K. Bhaskaran" Bhaskaran (supra) and " M/s M/s Kusum Ingots and Alloys
Bombay High Court
- Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Wazir Jaivir Chand and , K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan. 10. Regarding the contention that notice was not legal ... v. Suman Sethi and Ors. 2000 C Cr LR SC page 257 : 2000 Cri LJ 1391, Suman Sethi v. Ajay
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 27 - Cited by 0 -
2007 CriLJ 1026
- S K Gupta - Full Document
Judgment of the Supreme Court in in K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan (1999) 7 SCC 510, the Court within ... Counsel contended that in view of the authority in K. Bhaskaran, the Bombay High Court has held in number
Bombay High Court
- Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
referring to judgment in the case of K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan observed that giving of notice is different ... General Clauses Act in the judgment of K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan (hereafter called Bhaskaran's case). There
Delhi High Court
- Cites 23 - Cited by 0 -
149 (2008) DLT 172
- S Khanna - Full Document
Section 138. 6. In the case of K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Anr. , the question before the Supreme ... amount of cheque. In the case of K. Bhaskaran (supra), the Supreme Court has held that the unclaimed notice
Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0 -
I (2008) BC 86
- A Gohil - Full Document
Section 138 does not get attracted..." In K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan [1999] 7 SCC 510 ; [2000] 99 Comp ... that aspect." In Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. v. Pennar Peterson Securities Ltd. [2000] 100 Comp
Himachal Pradesh High Court
- Cites 15 - Cited by 0 -
2002 112 CompCas 493 HP
- A K Goel - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
Previous  
4
5
6
7
8  
9
10
11
12
13
Next