1 - 10 of 3726 (1.08 seconds)
Delhi High Court
N. Ranga Rao And Sons vs Anil Garg And Ors. on 2
Delhi High Court
India v. Roper, 1892 AC 125 (A), Lord Halsbury, in his
address to the House of Lords, said that ... authority to alter or qualify
and, therefore, in Lord Halsbury"s opinion the company were prohibited
by law from issuing
Bombay High Court
upon the well-known passage from the speech of
Lord Halsbury in Quinn v. Leathem ... logical at all."
This passage from the speech of Lord Halsbury was cited with approval
by the Privy Council
Gujarat High Court
solicitor in preparing the proof for trial. Lord
Halsbury referred to the immunity from responsibility in an action
when evidence ... exist in respect of statements made to the
solicitor, Lord Halsbury characterized the suggestion as ingenious.
He pointed out that
Calcutta High Court
waster of the capital. As was pointed out by lord Halsbury, L. C., in
Secretary of State in council ... royalties on coal. Dealing
with the observation of Lord Halsbury in Secretary of State in Council
of India v. Scoble
Patna High Court
Ooregum Gold
Mining Company of India v. Roper, LORD HALSBURY, in his address to the
House of Lords, said that ... authority to alter or qualify and, therefore
in LORD HALSBURY'S opinion, the company was prohibited by law from
issuing
Bombay High Court
Supreme Court of India
Gherulal Parakh vs Mahadeodas Maiya And Others on 26 March, 1959
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Reliance Airport Developers Pvt. ... vs Airports Authority Of India And ... on
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
V/O Tractor Export, Moscow vs M/S. Tarapore & Company
Supreme Court of India
full amount unpaid on the shares.
In his ,speech, Lord Halsbury observed that "Two things were
manifest ... difficulty created by the
decision of the House of Lords in the case of The Ooregum
Gold Mining
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -