1 - 10 of 65767 (3.95 seconds)
application is by way of compliance with a mandatory term of the trust or a mandatory rule governing the institution
Central Government Act
Supreme Court of India
State Bank Of Patiala & Ors vs S.K.Sharma on
Supreme Court of India
Election Petitions) Rules, 1951-Rule 47(1)(c)-Whether
mandatory or directory-Error manifest on the fa1e of record-
Interference ... well-established that an enactment in form mandatory
might in substance be directory, and that the use of the
word
Supreme Court of India
were in violation of some of the
relevant and mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act. The High
Court declined ... innocent persons are not harassed and
these provisions are mandatory in nature and non-compliance
of the same vitiates
Supreme Court of India
Narcotics Drugs
and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is mandatory and, if
so, what is the effect of the breach thereof ... this
Court held that the above section is mandatory and it is
obligatory on the part of the officer concerned
Supreme Court of India
case.
Section 233 of the Code is a mandatory provision and the
force of its direction is not weakened ... view that
a breach of any of the mandatory -provisions relating to ss.
233 to 239 of the Code, would
Supreme Court of India
Whether mandatory or
directory-Cognizance taken on a police report vitiated by a
breach of mandatory provisions -Legal effect thereof ... Corruption (Second Amendment) Act,
1952 (LIX of 1952) are mandatory and not directory and that
an investigation conducted in violation
Supreme Court of India
Constitution-Consulta-
tion of Public Service Commission--Whethcr mandatory-Consti-
tution of India, Arts. 311(2), 320(3) (c).
HEADNOTE ... Constitu-
tion of India are not mandatory and that they do not confer
any rights on a public servant
Supreme Court of India
affiliated to the University.
that there were certain mandatory provisions of the
University Act which were binding on the appellant ... statutory body acts in
breach or violation of the mandatory provisions of the Act.
[1020 E-G]
Sirsi Municipality
Supreme Court of India
Servant--Police Officer, dismissal of--Police Regula-
tions, whether mandatory--Disregard of, if invalidates
disciplinary action--Authorities empowered to take ... order of the
authority if the rules were mandatory Paragraph 486 of the
Police Regulations was mandatory and not directory
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -