1 - 10 of 11386 (1.53 seconds)
General Clauses Act, 1897 by necessary implication.
The Mischief Rule in Heydon's case decided in the year ... confined
to above circumstances. The real reason of the Mischief Rule is,
"ambiguity". It does not matter how the ambiguity
Madhya Pradesh High Court
established rule for construction of such words is the rule
laid down in Heydon's case which has now attained ... construction which shall suppress the mischief and advance the remedy.
Applying the said rule to the assessee's case
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi
General Clauses Act, 1897, by necessary implication. The Mischief Rule
in Heydon's case decided in the year ... confined
to above circumstances. The real reason of the Mischief Rule is
ambiguity. It does not matter how the ambiguity
Madhya Pradesh High Court
amended provisions, then the Hyden's Mischief Rule of
interpretation should be applied. It was submitted by him that ... assessee has also sought to apply the
Hyden's Mischief Rule and reliance was placed on the judgment of Surat
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
observations of the DRT which are
as follows:-
"The rule of construction is found in Heydon's Case ... country and in that context the Court applied the Mischief Rule.
While interpreting the words 'acquires possession' or 'keeping
Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
provision and
render it almost nugatory.
(13) The mischief rule and evasion theory are not new in the realm ... application of the mischief rule and the theory of advancing
the remedy, is not unknown even in the interpretation
Delhi High Court
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai
Wall Street Finance Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs (Prev
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
Dr. J.N. Mokashi vs Income-Tax Officer on 20
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
statute is
Heydon's rule also known as Mischief rule which deals with ascertaining
the correct intention of the Legislature ... defect.
(d) the true reasons of the remedy.
The Mischief rule was reap proved by, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
Delhi High Court
Calcutta High Court
Calcutta National Bank Ltd. (In ... vs Rangaroon Tea Co. Ltd. And Ors
Calcutta High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -