1 - 10 of 3477 (1.42 seconds)
caused by coercion, 1[ fraud or misrepresentation, the agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party whose ... practised, or to whom such misrepresentation was made, does not render a contract voidable. Illustrations
(a) A, intending to deceive
Central Government Act
result of such misrepresentation by the
Government in the auction notice. The contract could not be said to have
been ... that there was no misrepresentation as alleged. On the date
on which the contract was entered into
Supreme Court of India
false,
it entered into the suit contracts, According to appellant therefore ,
making and misrepresentation as regards a very material ... would not amount to a
fraudulent misrepresentation contemplated by Section 17 of the Contract
Act for the simple reason that
Gujarat High Court
been booked,
there has been a misrepresentation, and the contract is liable to be
avoided by the Society, and, accordingly ... explanation to Section 19 of the Contract Act, a
misrepresentation which does not cause the consent to a contract
Calcutta High Court
agreement is caused by coercion,
fraud or misrepresentation, the agreement is a contract voidable at
the option of the party ... goes to
show that in order to avoid a contract misrepresentation or fraud must
be proved to be the main
Madhya Pradesh High Court
ready and willing to perform
their part of the contract, and to pay the balance of the amount and
also ... agreement by fraudulent
misrepresentation and deceitful intent, the respondent No. 1 did not
repudiate the contract But it is alleged
Calcutta High Court
that whether there was fraud or fraudulent
misrepresentation which rendered the contract void or voidable,
should, if the Court think ... agreement is caused by coercion,
fraud or misrepresentation, the agreement is a contract voidable at the
option of the party
Calcutta High Court
impeach
the contract on the ground of misrepresentation de hors the contract.
If they had launched such a suit ... properly be impeached on the ground of misrepresentation de hors the
contract. Mr. Engineer was unable to cite
Bombay High Court
agreement is caused by coercion, fraud, or
misrepresentation, the agreement is a contract voidable at the
option of the party ... such misrepresentation was made, does not render a
contract voidable." Misrepresentation is defined as under by Section
18:
"18. Misrepresentation
Allahabad High Court
contract in India, a contract of
employment obtained by fraud, misrepresentation or mistake is not
ab-initio void ... consent was caused or obtained by fraud, misrepresentation or mistake.
Such contract is rendered voidable at the instance
Gujarat High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -