1 - 10 of 1691 (1.00 seconds)
case and that the suit is not bad for multifariousness.
While on the one hand we should not allow ... that the frame of the suit was bad for multifarious-ness and he passed
an order giving leave
Madras High Court
present instance is bad on the ground of
multifariousness, that is, misjoinder of parties and causes of action ... that he has given is on the issue of multifariousness and he
has dismissed the suit on that ground expressly
Calcutta High Court
Court below have
been attacked on the ground of multifariousness under the following
circumstances: The District .Judge of Dacca ... been assailed on the ground that
they were multifarious and conducted in a manner unknown to legal
procedure
Calcutta High Court
that the suit is barred on the ground of multifariousness and bad for
misjoinder of parties and misjoinder of causes ... appellant/ petitioner in one suit. According to him,
multifariousness will attract Order 7 Rule
Calcutta High Court
followed that the suit as
framed was bad for multifariousness though common questions of fact
arose for consideration, particularly ... since it
held that the suit was bad for multifariousness, there could be no
doubt that a claim if made
Madras High Court
defendants contended that the
suit is bad for multifariousness as the plaintiff has claimed
possession from defendant ... defendant proves that the suit is bad for
multifariousness Yes.
10. Whether the suit is properly valued for the purposes
Bombay High Court
that bars the suit is multifariousness.
2. The case made out in the plaint is this. The defendant ... against the defendant in one suit.
According to him multifarious ness will attract the provisions of Order
7 Rule
Calcutta High Court
Calcutta High Court
Nistarini Dassi vs Nundo Lall Bose And Anr. on 14 June, 1899
Calcutta High Court
case are whether the suit is bad for multifariousness
and whether the Subordinate Judge of Bareilly was justified in
entertaining ... unless it be that the claim was defective for
multifariousness. We have therefore first to consider whether
Allahabad High Court
raising an additional issue on the question of
multifarious-ness. This issue was raised and decided in favour ... question
whether the suit is bad for multifariousness. As the plaintiff alleges
that Harendra Nath Ghose is a benamdar
Calcutta High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -