1 - 10 of 4657 (1.72 seconds)
Order No. 5158 directing
corresponding mutation changes. The mutation entry, besides
mentioning the area of 263.4 bighas, also speaks ... plaintiff; (ii) the mere fact that in
the mutation entry the areas was shown to be 263.4 bighas
Supreme Court of India
issued; and
(e) On the above mentioned grounds the mutation entry was sought to be
cancelled.
The Deputy Collector issued ... appellant. It was decided that the revenue mutation entry No.
1950 as recorded in village form no. 6 was legal
Supreme Court of India
owner of the said property on account of a mutation entry made by the
father of the appellant-defendant ... produced on
record the certified copy of the Mutation Entry No. 2053 at Exhibit 45.
In the said mutation entry
Bombay High Court
against the mutation of
entry No. 1319 and other mutation entries carried out by the Talathi of
village Rajore ... Sanstha Maryadit, Rajore. Based on the said sale-deeds mutation entries
Nos. 1327 to 1330 were sanctioned by the Talathi
Bombay High Court
dismissed the revision application
and set aside the mutation Entry No. 2526 dated 27.4.1984 inspite of
the fact that ... said transaction of sale has
been certified by the mutation Entry No. 1933 on 18.10.1979. There is
another land bearing
Gujarat High Court
dated
30-12-1985 Annexure-B set aside the mutation Entry No. 1287 made
pursuant to the varadi dated ... date
of purchase. Accordingly, he set aside the mutation entry.
(d) The fourth respondent in whose favour the mutation Entry
Karnataka High Court
collusion with the Revenue Authorities got the mutation entry
mutated, whereby the original entry showing their father as the
permanent ... entered as the cultivator. That
the said mutation entry was not in consonance with law and therefore
Karnataka High Court
deed can be deemed
to be extinguished merely because
mutation entry in favour of transferee is
not recorded despite ... pleading, in
para 8, came across mutation entry No.2193 dated
2nd May, 1974 certified in favour of defendant
Bombay High Court
Collector were upheld and it was held
that mutation Entry No. 2605 is removed as the sale transaction was
violative ... petitioners that the
petitioners are agriculturist. The mutation Entry No. 1702 dated 2nd
May, 1977 (Annexure "A" to the memo
Gujarat High Court
these petitioners are concerned,
they are affected by mutation entry Nos. 5079 and 993 (Exhibits ... private forest". The petitioners thereafter noticed that the
mutation entries have resulted in further particulars being inserted in
the property
Bombay High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -