1 - 10 of 7471 (1.03 seconds)
realisation of the cheque the collecting bank had
acted without negligence -- negligence not merely at the stage of
encashment ... cheque in
question. The question whether the bank had acted with negligence in
the opening of the account will, however
Madras High Court
encouragement, and if a customer of a bank,
by his negligence, to give timely information of forged
cheques, allows amount ... couragement. If a customer of a bank, by his negligence to
give timely information of forged cheques, allows amount
Supreme Court of India
bank had been observed but whether the bank had "acted without
negligence in opening a new account and though ... realisation of the cheque the collecting Bank had acted
without negligence - negligence not merely at the stage of encashment
Madras High Court
Delhi High Court
Union Of India (Uoi) vs National Overseas And Grindlays ... on 22 January
Delhi High Court
prejudicial to the
interests of the bank, or gross
negligence or negligence involving or
likely to involve the Bank ... prejudicial to the
interests of the bank, or gross negligence or negligence
involving or likely to involve the Bank
Supreme Court of India
time to time
by Head Office. Due to his negligence Bank's
money is in jeopardy. Out of good number ... aforesaid negligence and
irregular action Sri Gupta has violated the
rules 3(1) & 3(3) of Allahabad Bank Officer
Supreme Court of India
goods were lost on account of the negligence of the
creditor Bank. Whole of the security was lost and,
therefore ... tins was lost on account of the negligence of the Bank.
Disagreeing with the trial court the High Court held
Supreme Court of India
mandate by the Society to the Bank.
Therefore, there was no negligence on the part of the
Society ... Contrary, there was negligence on the part
of the Bank in not ascertaining whether the signatures on
the cheque were
Supreme Court of India
Commission)
holding that there was no negligence on the part of the respondent Bank
in dealing with its security ... caused could not be attributed to the negligence of the Bank as it was
the appellant himself who misled
Supreme Court of India
Torts-Break in canal bank-Suit for damages--defendants'
negligence--Non-production of documents by defendant-If
adverse inference ... action alleging that the breach in
the bank was caused by negligence on the part of the canal
authorities
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -