1 - 10 of 111476 (4.73 seconds)
India, Articles 14,19 and 39(d) "Equal
pay for equal work" is not an abstract doctrine ... belong to different
departments and that the equal pay for equal work is not a
principle which the courts
Supreme Court of India
that is
violative of constitutional right of "equal pay for equal
work".
%
Articles 14 and 39(d)--'Equal ... pay for equal work'--
Concept of--Whether permissible to have two pay scales in
same cadre for persons having same
Supreme Court of India
their service and are not being paid equal pay
for equal work as has been mandated by this Court ... Court considering both
the aspects of 'equal pay for equal work' and continuing
casual employment for too long re-affirmed
Supreme Court of India
permissible--Whether violative of principle of 'equal pay
for equal work'.
Constitution of India, 1950: Articles ... graduate supervisors on the prin-
ciple of equal pay for equal work, as they constituted the
same service and performed
Supreme Court of India
Articles 14, 16 and
39(d)--'Equal pay for equal work'--Principle of--Cannot be
invoked invariably in every kind ... failed
to implement the Directive Principle of 'Equal pay for equal
work' as contained
Supreme Court of India
which they
worked. They did both receiving and paying work and took
charge of the cash in the single lock ... department who may be doing either receiving work or paying
work or even both paying and receiving work.
Central Bank
Supreme Court of India
that post by applying the
principle of equal pay for equal work.
11. Shri Anil Kumar Sangal, learned counsel ... question whether the principle of `equal pay for equal work' can
be read as part of the doctrine of equality
Supreme Court of India
respondents
contended that applying the principle of "equal pay for
equal work" they are entitled to get the minimum ... this Court held that the doctrine of "equal pay for
equal work" is not an abstract doctrine which
Supreme Court of India
benefits of the
accepted principle of "Equal Pay For Equal Work" on the basis of de
jure inequality arising ... appellants that, the
principle of 'Equal Pay for Equal Work' could not have been invoked in
the facts and circumstances
Gujarat High Court
identical work attracting the constitutional mandate of equal pay
for equal work."
19. In paragraph 12 of the counter ... grant of relief in respect of
`equal pay for equal work".
24. The learned counsel for the second respondent
Delhi High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -