1 - 10 of 47919 (4.83 seconds)
learned Senior Counsel, will amount to non application of mind while arriving at the subjective satisfaction and will vitiate ... number is left blank. This shows the clear non application of mind on the part of the Detaining Authority. Learned
Madras High Court
remand-prisoner lodged in jail, it
only showed non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority ... factually not, it would still amount to
non-application of mind. The Division Bench held that if the accused
Madras High Court
remand-prisoner lodged
in jail, it only showed non-application of mind on the part of the
detaining authority ... factually not, it would still amount to
non-application of mind. The Division Bench held that if the accused
Madras High Court
based on cogent materials.
vi) There is non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority since ... said detenu. The same will show non-application of mind vitiating the order of detention. The detenu Rajendran
Madras High Court
cannot be declared invalid for the reason of non-application
of mind, any more than any other law call ... struck
584
down on the ground of non-application of mind. Not the act
of a Legislature. The power
Supreme Court of India
impugned order of detention is bad due to non-application of mind
and vague grounds. I have described above ... grounds
are vague or are bad for non-application of mind. The learned Advocate
for the petitioner has referred
Calcutta High Court
passed casually and mechanically
and without application of mind. It is a non-speaking order and does
not state ... submitted that the said order suffers from total
non-application of mind, and it appears to have been passed
mechanically
Calcutta High Court
reasonable one and is the
result of non-application of mind to the allegations made and the
evidence adduced ... order of dismissal is the result of non-application of mind to Clause
25(34) of the Standing Orders
Karnataka High Court
result of
paucity of time, there is non-application of mind on the part of the
detaining authority which ... sponsoring authority and hence, there is non-application of
mind on the part of the detaining authority, which renders
Bombay High Court
Secondly, it was contended that the grounds indicate
non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority.
Thirdly ... that the
authority acted mechanically and there was non-application of mind
because on the very same facts the earlier
Calcutta High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -