1 - 10 of 40058 (2.09 seconds)
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
92. Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement.- When the terms of any such contract, grant ... according to the last section, no evidence of any oral agreement or statement shall be admitted, as between the parties
Central Government Act
made either by a registered instrument or by oral agreement accompanied by delivery of possession. 4[ Where a lease ... leases, may be made by unregistered instrument or by oral agreement without delivery of possession
Central Government Act
contended that the transferor and the transferee
entered into oral agreement to reconvey the said land to the
transferor ... appellate authority also held that
there was no oral agreement for reconveyance. Accordingly, the orders
passed by the Special Officer
Supreme Court of India
alia by taking the
plea that there was an oral agreement arrived at between the
parties to freeze ... produced no evidence in support of its
plea of oral agreement. The Labour Commissioner found that
no oral agreement
Supreme Court of India
representative are at liberty to lead evidence of oral
agreement notwithstanding the fact that such evidence if
believed, may contradict ... Evidence Act.
Section 92 excludes the evidence of oral agreements and it
applies to cases where the terms of contracts
Supreme Court of India
were delivered under and in
pursuance of an oral agreement arrived at between
743
Lalta Prasad Goenka, a director ... said
quantity as aforesaid was delivered under the said oral
agreement and therefore could charge
Supreme Court of India
contract
of sale of immovable property on basis of oral agreement
alone--Heavy burden lies on plaintiff to prove consensus ... making the formal agreement of sale incor-
porating the oral agreement arrived at on 3rd May, 1979;
that
Supreme Court of India
accounts.
Indian Evidence Act, 1872, s. 92, Proviso 3--Oral agreement
not to enforce promissory note till certain conditions
precedent ... fulfilled-Such oral agreement whether can be
proved.
HEADNOTE:
An agent sued his principals for rendition of accounts
Supreme Court of India
main grounds, namely, that there was
an oral agreement between him and the petitioner in his capacity as
agent ... while the claim was not
barred by limitation, the oral agreement relied upon by the first
judgment-debtor was true
Madras High Court
Contract-oral agreement to sell land-Formal document to be
executed later but not actually executed-Mode of payment ... firm except the
appellant had entered into an oral agreement with him on
July 6, 1952 to sell 137 shares
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -