Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
All
31 - 40 of 33425 (3.00 seconds)

Madras High Court C.B.M. College By Its Secretary ... vs The Federation Of College
Madras High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0 -
(1998) 1 MLJ 373
- S A Wahab - Full Document
Civil Procedure Code is different from a suit filed under Order 1 Rule 8 of Civil Procedure Code ... leave under Section 92, C.P.C. Permission under Order 1 Rule 8, C.P.C. may be granted even
Punjab-Haryana High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0 -
(1999) 121 PLR 346
- V Aggarwal - Full Document
C.P.C. and the application of the respondents Nos. 2 to 6 under Order 1, Rule 8 ... further submitted that the mandatory provisions of Order 1, Rule 8, C.P.C. has not been complied with
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 34 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 2003 All 140
- R Agrawal - Full Document
applications under Order 21 CPC. Since the application under Order 21 Rule 106 CPC was filed after the period ... also inapplicable. In Kailash (supra), while scrutinizing Order 8 Rule 1 CPC Supreme Court has observed that the rules
Delhi High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A K Pathak - Full Document
governed by the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short 'the CPC'). Order 1 Rule 8 of the CPC itself provides ... Court was that the provisions of Order 1 Rule 8 of the CPC were not applicable in the case
Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Rajasthan High Court Bhanwarlal And Ors. vs Rajasthan State Road Transport ... on 12 March, 1984
Rajasthan High Court
- Cites 161 - Cited by 0 -
(1985) ILLJ 111 Raj
- G Lodha - Full Document
suit is bad in view of Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC. (6) Clause 2(n) of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting ... also would try to invoke Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC and put forth his argument that the suit falls
Madras High Court
- Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
procedure prescribed under the Order I Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code, (2) such a suit is barred under ... also barred under section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code and (4) the impugned Resolutions passed by the Trust were
Bombay High Court
- Cites 24 - Cited by 0 -
(2001) 1 BOMLR 482
- R Kochar - Full Document
Court by giving a public notice under Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC. The Board reconsidered the matter ... fresh tenancy/lease." Proceedings under Order 1 Rule 8 of the CPC were initiated putting all the lessees
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 13 - Cited by 89 - R Lahoti - Full Document
Madras High Court P.R. Nallathambi Goundan vs Vijaya Raghavan And Ors. on 23 March
Madras High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 7 -
(1972) 2 MLJ 535
- S Maharajan - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
Previous  
1
2
3
4  
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next