Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 133070 (6.14 seconds)

favour of all the plaintiffs or defendants under Order 22 Rule 3 and Order 41, Rule ... Order 22, Rule 3 which, it read with Rule 11 makes the provisions of Rule 3 apply mutatis mutandis
Andhra High Court
- Cites 20 - Cited by 6 -
AIR 1963 AP 168
- J Reddy
22, Rule 3, C. P. C. In support of the earlier application of the appellants made under Rule 3, Order ... appellants made under Rule 3, Order 22, is, there fore, rejected. 14. Order 22, Rule
Patna High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 1961 Pat 178
- R K Prasad
exclusion of others. The case comes within Order 22, Rules 3 and 11 C. P. C.; and not within Order ... such abatement, by the combined effect of Order 22, Rules 3, 9 and 11 C. P. C., the appeal ceases
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 48 - Cited by 3 -
AIR 1963 Cal 289
- Bachawat
under Rule 3 or Rule 4. It appears that the learned District Judge was of the view that Order ... 3 and 4, of O.22, no limitation is prescribed for presentation of an application under Order 22 Rule
Bombay High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 2 -
AIR 1979 Bom 109
- Ginwala
Rule 1 of Order 43 which only provides that an order under Rule 9 of Order ... under Order 22, Rule 4 (3) C.P.C. and not under Rule 9 of Order
Rajasthan High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 2005 Raj 161
- P Tatia
order under Order 21, Rule 50 (2), Order 21, Rule 58 etc. 5. There seems to be a general consensus ... holding any enquiry. So this is an order under Order 22, Rules 3 and 5 of the Code. An order
Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Cites 32 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1981 MP 1
- C Sen
requirement. No appeal is provided against an order under Order 22 Rule 3 and 5 of the Code, either under ... Code, from an order under Rule 9 of Order 22 refusing to set aside the abatement or dismissal
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0
application (IA 8670/2003) for substitution under Order 22 Rule 10 for leave of the Court to continue the suit ... substitution under Order 22 Rule 3 of the CPC and a substitution under Rule 10 of Order 22 CPC stand
Delhi High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - B D Ahmed
inconsistent with Order 22 Rule 3 sub-rule (1) and the provision contained in Order 22 Rule 3 sub-rule ... Court for bringing themselves on record under Order 22 Rule 3 sub-rule (1). But the question is whether they
Gujarat High Court
- Cites 20 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1967 Guj 118
respondents No. 2 and 3 (Prem Singh and Ravinder Singh Sokhi) under Order 22 Rule 10 of CPC for substitution ... 3 and application dated 10.5.2006 (Annexure P- 11) filed by Avtar Singh Hunjan under Order 22 Rule 10 for substitution
Punjab-Haryana High Court
- Cites 17 - Cited by 0
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next