Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 8275 (0.80 seconds)

contain the requisite averments in compliance of Order 38, Rule 5 C.P.C and the learned Judge also failed ... satisfy the requirement of the provision of Order 38 Rule 5 C.P.C by making such averments
Madras High Court
- Cites 10 - Cited by 4 -
(2002) 2 MLJ 146
- S Jagadeesan - Full Document
failed to make out a case under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. 13. It is contended that the respondent ... that the Court cannot invoke the principles of Order 41 Rule 5 C.P.C. while entertaining objections
Delhi High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - V Sanghi - Full Document
importing the provisions of order 38, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code as it is. It is true ... hold that the provisions of Order 38, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code cannot be read
Madras High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
plaintiff moved an application under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC praying for a direction to defendants to furnish security ... prima facie case. It granted relief under Order 38 rule 5, in exercise of revisional jurisdiction, swayed by the fact
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 2 - Cited by 28 - Full Document
into it the provisions of Order 38, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code as it is. It is true ... hold that the provisions of Order 38, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code cannot be read
Bombay High Court
- Cites 16 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 2004 Bom 136
- R Lodha - Full Document
contemplated by Rule 6; consequently no appeal lies under Order 43, Rule 1, clause (q), Civil Procedure Code ... under Order 43 (1) (q), Civil Procedure Code where no conditional attachment has been made under Order 38, Rule
Madras High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 2000 Mad 483
- Full Document
Arbitral Tribunal shall not bound by the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The said provision ... herein to satisfy the requirement as contemplated under Order 38, Rule 5, C.P.C. is concerned, at the outset
Madras High Court
- Cites 33 - Cited by 3 -
2004 (2) ARBLR 284 Madras
- P Sathasivam - Full Document
another application to furnish security. Under Order 38, Rule 5 of C.P.C., when the defendants failed to comply ... have satisfied this Court the conditions prescribed under Order 38, Rule 5(l)(a), C.P.C. In a suit
Madras High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 1 -
2004 (1) CTC 117
- A Rajan - Full Document
further stated that earlier applications under Order 38, Rule 5 of the C.P.C. were moved on wrong advice ... already rejected the application of the applicant under Order 38, Rule 5 of the C.P.C. by order dated
Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Cites 32 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1998 MP 93
- Full Document
Bombay High Court Companies Act vs Mr. Ashok Khurana on 10 January, 2014 Bench: R
Bombay High Court
- Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next