1 - 10 of 3387 (1.02 seconds)
court--Interpretation of clauses of such co
n-
tract-Ouster clause II--Interpretation and constructi
on
of--In particular:
Section ... Civil Procedure Code-Civil court--Jurisdi
c-
tion-Ouster of--Interpretation of clauses of contract.
Statutory Interpretation 'Ouster clause '--Construction
Supreme Court of India
Adverse Possession-Possession of co-heir, when adverse-
Ouster-Possession of Receiver pendente lite, if can be
tacked.
HEADNOTE ... from January
20, 1930, was adverse and amounted to ouster of the other
co-heirs, such adverse possession
Supreme Court of India
disputed by Mr.
Sarma. There was, therefore, an open ouster by
Prafulla since 1950. The plaintiff brought the
suit ... contesting respondents
did not raise any plea nor proved ouster of other co-sharers.
Mr. Amlan Kumar Ghosh, learned counsel
Supreme Court of India
Kerala High Court
E. Keshava Bhat vs K.S. Subraya Bhat on 29 August, 1979
Kerala High Court
claim was not
barred by limitation by exclusion and ouster and
defendants 1 and 2 in the suit ... thereby lost her right by exclusion
and ouster ?
(3) Whether the Lower Appellate Court
was right in omitting to note
Supreme Court of India
other co-sharer which may
amount to ouster. We need not dwell upon this aspect of the matter in
this ... sharer who
claims or asserts ouster to prove the same. The point with which we are
concerned is: Should
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Structure cannot invariably be treated as conclusive evidence of
ouster, tor it may well be, that a property cannot ... without
making extensive and substantial improvements. The test of ouster in
such a case is whether the plaintiff has sustained
Punjab-Haryana High Court
shares is, in the absence of any proof of ouster by
the co-sharer in possession of the entirety ... sharers is not regarded as amounting to ouster or as
investing the possession in the hands
Madras High Court
defendants did not
amount to an ouster.
2. The Courts below have made a decree in favour of the plaintiff ... defendant are perfectly legitimate and
do not constitute an ouster of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has now
appealed to this
Calcutta High Court
Rowther and the members of his branch and by
ouster for nearly three decades, and the members of the other ... Sangheer Khan or by separate and exclusive
possession and ouster for nearly three decades, with the result that
the right
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -