Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
Courts
cat_ernakulam
81 - 90 of 345 (0.47 seconds)

that pre-2006 retirees should be extended the same pensionary benefits as that of post 2006 retirees cannot be accepted ... post-2006 retirees cannot be extended the same pensionary benefits in as much as the respondents on the basis
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
been inflicted upon the applicant as terminal and pensionary benefits which are based upon the last pay drawn had considerably ... years and to grant him consequential benefits including revised pensionary benefits as expeditiously as possible. c) Grant such other relief
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Railway service of Smt.Radhika Nair reckoned for pensionary benefits in the KSEB. Annexure A- 3 is a certificate issued ... service rendered by the applicant can be reckoned for pensionary benefits in the KSEB, subject to realization of pension liabilities
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Annexure A-22 order of the 3rd respondent denying pensionary benefits for the service rendered in the Botanical Survey ... leave encashment and GPF etc. (A-9) but his pensionary benefits were not released so far. He submitted several representations
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
aggrieved by the non-finalization of his pensionary benefits on the ground that departmental proceedings are pending against ... seeking also finalization of the pensionary benefits. After filing of this OA respondents issued the order dated 02.4.2008 appointing
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
that they will become eligible for the pensionary benefits under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 and the GPF scheme ... date of arising of vacancy for the purpose of pensionary benefits, holding that the lapses and the delay in conducting
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
responsible for causing delay in payment of pensionary benefits to the applicants. In the reply statement and additional reply statement ... seniority dispute which had nothing to do with the pensionary benefits of the applicants. 6. This Tribunal perused the record
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
regularisation effective from 10.3.97 and, therefore, entitled for pensionary benefits. The operative part of the order is as under ... effective from 10.3.97. He is therefore entitled to the pensionary benefits on the basis of total length of qualifying service
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
years of service is required for availing full pensionary benefits, he has only 23 years of total service under ... Government is also counted, he he may get full pensionary benefits. Applicant has, therefore, made the Annexure A-2 representation
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
respectively. They retired on superannuation without any pensionary benefits on 31.12.2005 and 31.3.2006 respectively. The case of the applicants ... Bearer on commission basis cannot be 3 counted for pensionary benefits. The applicants were originally engaged on contract basis therefore
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
Previous  
5
6
7
8
9  
10
11
12
13
14
Next