1 - 10 of 2797 (0.87 seconds)
orders
of the State Government rejecting their prayer for premature
release.
Four petitioners were convicted under Section ... approached this court earlier
as their prayer for premature release was rejected by the
State Government. This court set aside
Supreme Court of India
433A.
Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules,
1950: Premature release of Prisoners-Whether subject to
overriding powers of Sections ... filed a Writ Petition before the High Court for
premature release on the plea that he was entitled
Supreme Court of India
days. The only ground on which his case for
premature release has been deferred by the Sentence Revising Board ... Raghu-nath)
consideration of their cases for premature release has been deferred by
the Sentence Revising Board as certain reports
Supreme Court of India
life sentence--Conviction
prior to introduction Of section 433A--Premature release of
such life convicts-Consideration by State Government ... prior to amendment of Cr. P.C. in
1978--Premature release of--Applicability of the instruc-
tions.
HEADNOTE:
Paragraph
Supreme Court of India
disclose
that no guideline has been issued relating to premature release of the
prisoners. Under the circumstance, the All India ... recommended category of prisoner should not be considered for
premature release. This recommendation was subsequently accepted and on
the basis
Madras High Court
under Article 161
of the Constitution, for grant of premature release to the convicts and
the instructions contained in Annexure ... sentence, and more than 14 years sentence including remissions.
Premature release case of the petitioner was forwarded to the
Government
Punjab-Haryana High Court
consideration applied in the prescribed forms for their
premature release under Rule 358 while others applied under Rule ... mandatory minimum before he could claim his premature release under
Rule 358 or 359 of the Prison Rules
Madhya Pradesh High Court
consequently to direct the respondents to consider her premature release from prison.
2. The appellant herein is a convict prisoner ... should complete 14 years of imprisonment for any premature release as provided under Section 433(A) of Criminal Procedure Code
Madras High Court
recommended not to consider their cases for premature release on en-masse release. Since, the Petitioner is involved in heinous ... prisoners should not be eligible for consideration of premature release:
i.Prisoners convicted of rape, forgery, dacoity, terrorist crimes, offences
Madras High Court
fact
that their case have riped for premature release as they have undergone
a sentence of more than 14 years ... petitions the grievance voiced is
that their case for premature release under the Rules of 1958 has been
refused
Rajasthan High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -