Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 26258 (2.67 seconds)

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 64. Proof of documents by primary evidence. Documents must be proved by primary evidence except
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 119
found to be not genuine. Exhibit B is itself primary evidence of the matters contained in it, as it purports ... general rule, is admissible only in the absence of primary evidence. If the original itself is found to be inadmissible
Madras High Court
- Cites 29 - Cited by 4 -
(1915) 28 MLJ 266
- Spencer - Full Document
Delhi High Court Chandro Devi And Ors. vs Jit Singh And Ors. on 14 April
Delhi High Court
- Cites 49 - Cited by 1 -
2 (1988) ACC 467
- S Sapra - Full Document
Andhra High Court N.Srihari (Died) And Others vs N.Prakash And Others on 30
Andhra High Court
- Cites 38 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
Delhi High Court Chandro Devi And Others vs Jit Singh And Others on 14 April
Delhi High Court
- Cites 48 - Cited by 0 -
1989 66 CompCas 149 Delhi
- S N Sapra - Full Document
evidence. As per Section 62 of the Evidence Act, primary evidence means the document itself produced for the inspection ... lays down that documents must be proved by primary evidence except in the cases mentioned in the following sections
Madras High Court
- Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
proved either by primary or by secondary evidence. 62.-Primary evidence-- Primary evidence means the document itself produced ... document is executed in several parts, each part is primary evidence of the document: Where a document is executed
Madras High Court
- Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
following terms:- 64. Proof of documents by primary evidence - Documents must be proved by primary evidence except in the cases ... best evidence, is that they must be proved by primary evidence, ie., by production of the original document itself, there
Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Shree Chalthan Vibhag Khand Udyog ... vs Income Tax Officer on
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad
- Cites 16 - Cited by 0 -
(2006) 104 TTJ Ahd 654
- Full Document
that the document was refused to be received as primary evidence and, therefore, it cannot be received as secondary evidence ... learned Judge had not understood the distinction between the primary evidence and the secondary evidence and during the course
Andhra High Court
- Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next