1 - 10 of 2907 (1.06 seconds)
Arbitrary
Tribunal is that there is no privity of contract between ONGC and
EOL and the appellant is contractually liable ... hand, the
dissenting view is that there was privity of contract exists between
the first respondent and the ONGC
Andhra High Court
which read as under:-
"19. There was a privity of contract between the two
petitioners and the respondent company ... Contract,
Thirteenth Edition, have put the Doctrine of Privity of
Contract as:
"The doctrine of privity, while in principle
Delhi High Court
before me by Mr. Holla was that the
privity of contract which existed between defendant 1 and the plaintiff ... between whom and the
lessor them is a privity of contract has the liberty to terminate that
privity of contract
Karnataka High Court
Rajasthan High Court
State Of Rajasthan vs Bhilwara Spinners Ltd. And Ors. on 27 November
Rajasthan High Court
clear that as far as the privity of contract is
concerned, the only person liable as between the lessor ... lessee
is the lessee himself. There is no privity of contract established by
the assignment executed by the lessee
Bombay High Court
after proper identification and
that there was no privity of contract as between the plaintiff and it
(defendant ... agent and that there was no privity of
contract between defendant No. 2 and the plaintiff and that the
plaintiff
Punjab-Haryana High Court
contended, inter alia, that as
there was no privity of contract between them and the plaintiff and as
they ... trial Judge further held that there being
no privity of contract between the defendants Nos.2 to 4 with
Gujarat High Court
Constitution would
apply. This judgment emphasised on privity of contract as a direct
result of which goods are transported across ... attract the first limb, the existence of privity
of contract will be necessary. To attract the second limb, two
conditions
Madras High Court
maintain action in rem only if there existed privities of
contract between itself and the owners of the vessel ... raised in the application that there was no
privity of contract with the owner of the vessel is irrelevant
Gujarat High Court
view of the fact that there
was no privity of contract between Appellant and the
Haryana Power ... APPEAL NO.130 OF 2011
establish any privity of contract between the Appellant
and Haryana Power. Hence, the State Commission
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -