Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 115895 (0.33 seconds)

Amendment) Act, 1987, w. e. f. 1- 4- 1989. quit 2. Inserted by the Finance
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 416
notice to determine the lease, or to quit, or of intention to quit, the property leased, duly given
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 374
tenant merely by serving on him a notice to quit as is the position under the Transfer of Property ... Rent Control) Act, 1970 calling upon him to quit on the ground of personal necessity. The Rent Controller rejected
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 34 - Cited by 198 -
1979 AIR 1745
Supreme Court of India The State Of Bombay vs Atma Ram Sridhar Vaidya on 25
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 13 - Cited by 140 -
1951 AIR 157
facts the charge against the first respondent was quite clear and simple and it was not necessary that a formal ... position of an Attorney General in England is quite different from that of the Attorney General in India. Unlike
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 35 - Cited by 124 -
1971 AIR 1132
Property Act, 1882 113. Waiver of notice to quit.- A notice given under section 111, clause (h), is waived, with ... lessor, gives B, the lessee, notice to quit the property leased. The notice expires. B tenders, and A accepts, rent
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 101
July, 1960, the appellant landlord issued a notice to quit to the res- pondent. Nearly 5 months after the fixation ... appellant allowed the application under Article 227. This was quite unwarranted. [205GH. 206A] 200 Babhutmal Raichand Oswal v. Laxmibai
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 14 - Cited by 89 -
1978 AIR 955
Supreme Court of India Thyssen Stahlunion Gmbh vs Steel Authority Of India Ltd. on 7
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 83 - Cited by 81 -
AIR 1999 SC 3923
- D Wadhwa
defendant as a monthly tenant served notice to quit on him on the 18th July, 1942, asking the latter ... facts of the case it was quite proper to hold that the tenancy was one from month to month since
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 8 - Cited by 79 -
1952 AIR 23
defendants further contended that the motion picture was quite different from the play both in contents, spirit and climax ... opinion that the film taken as a whole is quite different. from the play written by the appellant. This Court
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 12 - Cited by 72 -
1978 AIR 1613
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next