1 - 10 of 47 (1.63 seconds)
Hanumant's case (supra) cannot
be construed as ratio-decidendi binding on this Court or
even obiter dictum
Supreme Court of India
proceeded under Rule 3, an appeal could lie.
The ratio-decidendi of that case is that the right of appeal
Rajasthan High Court
Supreme Court of India
Aneeta Hada vs M/S Godfather Travels & Tours ... on 8
Supreme Court of India
that case. It is trite to say that ratio
decidendi is binding in subsequent cases. All general observations made ... subsequent cases. The Court has to find out the ratio-decidendi
and, the true principle enunciated in the precedent. Each
Andhra High Court
decree as
'incidental', 'not part of the ratio decidendi, 'obiter dicta' and 'not
authoritative.'
It is necessary at this stage ... incidental'. It is 'not part of the ratio-decidendi'. It is 'obiter
dicta' and 'not authoritative.' The said part
Supreme Court of India
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Punjab Urban Development ... vs Dashmesh Educational Society And ... on 12 October
Punjab-Haryana High Court
present case, we are of the view, that the
ratio-decidendi of that decision can be extended to the facts
Allahabad High Court
seen from all these decisions the ratio-decidendi in these
decisions is that the employment notification should be made notifying
Andhra High Court
Calcutta High Court
Pradip Kumar Banerjee vs Airport Authority Of India And ... on 23 February
Calcutta High Court
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs M.Mahendran on 5 January, 2008
BEFORE THE
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -