1 - 10 of 165410 (3.91 seconds)
replies to the main petition since these replies were filed last.
12. Suit No.812 of 1997 :
As pointed ... replies to this notice of motion. In
the first reply filed on 3rd May 2001, he reiterated the stand taken
Bombay High Court
ordered to be impleaded as a
party. Yusuf filed reply accepting the claim of the claimant. Abdul
Wahid filed reply ... ordered to be impleaded as a party. Yusuf
filed reply accepting the claim of the claimant. Abdul Wahid filed
reply
Rajasthan High Court
petitions, the respondent No.2 has filed
affidavits-in-reply controverting the averments made in the
petitions. It has been ... Governance Plan (Annexure R-1) to the affidavit-in-reply filed by
the respondent No.2, it was submitted that
Gujarat High Court
compilation of the
writ petition. In reply to the application filed
by the petitioner, respondent No. 3 by his letter ... before
B
the High Court. The respondents filed their
affidavit in reply in the said writ petition. It
is further
Bombay High Court
Upadhyay,
Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, has filed reply affidavit on
behalf of State controverting the averments made in the petition ... produced
along with his reply (1) affidavit-in-reply filed by Mr.G.D.Vyas,
Secretary, Land Reforms, filed
Gujarat High Court
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad
Ravindra M.Agrawal, Ahmedabad vs Department Of Income Tax on
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad
thereafter seems to have filed their
rejoinder to the reply filed by the respondent. On the next
date, namely ... application
before the State Commission saying that the reply filed by
the respondent was beyond a period of 30 days
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Shahbuddin & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on
Supreme Court of India
Desai (petitioner No. 1 in the
Company Petition) filed reply on the grounds, inter alia, that the
application ... affidavit and
reply on 22.3.1988 and the company also filed reply on the said date.
In their reply the contesting
Supreme Court of India
deleted as a party to the
petition. However, the reply filed by him is being relied
upon on behalf ... other respondents. In the reply filed
by the ist respondent, it is contended that the President
had issued the impugned
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -