1 - 10 of 11730 (1.29 seconds)
petitioner-Corporation has contended that the respondent-workman
remained absent from 1st September, 1983, and thereafter, charge-sheet
was issued ... learned
Advocate Mr. Munshaw is that the respondent-workman remained absent
without prior permission of the authority, and therefore
Gujarat High Court
employed as a workman by the appellants. The
respondent remained absent from duty with effect from 25-8-1982 without ... appellants addressed to
the respondent. The respondent continued to remain absent and it was by
a letter dated
Supreme Court of India
this
very case it is said that the respondents remained absent
for a longer period than that provided ... entitled to it. The fact
that the respondents remained absent for a longer period
than that provided
Supreme Court of India
High Court though endorses that the respondent
did remain absent for about 3 years and that there was no satisfactory ... with consequential retiral benefits
after indorsing that the respondent did remain absent for about 3 years and
that there
Supreme Court of India
evidence it seems that
the respondent had made it a habit of remaining absent from
duty without obtaining prior permission ... past also he was found to be remaining absent and
irregular in work and leaving his work without any leave
Supreme Court of India
Respondents written request dated 25.6.2005.
However, the Respondents remained absent on 8.7.2005,
and therefore they were set ex-parte, while ... List of Management
Witnesses, whereas Respondents Nos.1 and 3 remained
absent.
(f) The Enquiry was then adjourned
Supreme Court of India
award
dated 28.06.1996, it was held that the Respondent remained absent from
27.11.1990 to 02.12.1993 and, thus, committed a misconduct ... buses can allow an employee to remain absent for a long time. The
Respondent had been given opportunities to resume
Supreme Court of India
bench of Rajasthan High Court. The respondent who was an
employee remained unauthorisedly absent from 1983 till ... relevant factors including the circumstances
under which the respondent remained absent from duty and ultimately
came to the conclusion that
Supreme Court of India
respondent is not a Government servant.
Unless his services are regularised in accordance with law,
his services remain ... from May 1986 to August 19, 1986
the respondent remained absent. from duty without any proper
sanction of the competent
Supreme Court of India
that behalf was framed.
Indisputably, thereafter, the respondents remained absent and an ex
parte decree came to be passed ... admitted
and the notice would go to the respondents. The
respondents would be put on notice of the amount
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -