1 - 10 of 2923 (1.93 seconds)
Supreme Court of India
M/S Gujarat Pottling Co.Ltd. & Ors vs The Coca
Supreme Court of India
Convenant in restraint of trade-Contract Act, 1872,
Section 27, scope of-Whether a post-service restrictive
covenant in restraint ... ground
that they are in restraint of trade. Such agreements are
enforceable, the reason being that the doctrine of restraint
Supreme Court of India
Indian Contract Act, 1872 has been in restraint of trade.
It was submitted by learned senior counsel for the appellant ... first refusal is merely regulatory and not in
restraint of trade.
FACTS:
The appellant is a company incorporated under
Supreme Court of India
completion of the
contract, is in the restraint of trade and, therefore, void under
Section 27 of the Contract ... statutory provision pertaining to agreement in restraint of
trade as contained in Section 27 of the Contract Act reads thus
Bombay High Court
whether a post-service restrictive covenant
in restraint of trade as contained in Clause (10) of the service
agreement between ... view that the negative covenant, being in
partial restraint of trade, was reasonable inasmuch as it was limited
both
Supreme Court of India
impose unreasonable restraint of trade on the defendant Kalicharan'
and his transferees and consequently the defendants were bound ... exercise
? of gainful occupation. A bargain in restraint trade is illegal if
the restraint is unreasonable. A restraint of trade
Rajasthan High Court
appellant and the respondent would amount to restraint of trade prohibited under Section 27 of the Indian Contract ... compete clause in the agreement amounts to restraint in trade and that under Section 27 of the Contract Act, Clause
Madras High Court
Delhi High Court
Wipro Limited vs Beckman Coulter International ... on 11 July, 2006 Equivalent citations
Delhi High Court
dissolution deed (Ex. 2) did not impose unreasonable restraint of
trade on the defendant Kalicharan and his transferees, and consequently ... deal, as to whether the covenant in restraint
of trade, contained in Clause 13 of the dissolution deed
Rajasthan High Court
employer
exclusively are not to be regarded as restraint of trade and
therefore do not fall under ... similar or
substantially similar duties is not a restraint of trade
unless the contract as aforesaid is unconscionable or
excessively
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -