1 - 10 of 215 (0.43 seconds)
OFE1QD EXCh&0Qé Mahwpuiatcrs iscrfsiturs cf Prcpsrty; Act,
1887 (SAFEMA). Zh crcsr tc g1vs shaps tc ths
FECOMMEDGEZTQDS ... must
extend not oniy to — as does SAFEMA — properties
acquired in the name of the hoider of such
Law Commission Report
brother, to get the notice issued against him
under SAFEMA quashed on all the grounds available to him,
though they ... fact that proceedings
against the respondent taken under SAFEMA were abandoned
after the order of this Court on 4th November
Supreme Court of India
being taken against the detenus,
their friends and relatives under SAFEMA. .[The orders of
detention, it is not in dispute ... associates, when proceedings
are taken against him/them under SAFEMA, even
though the said order of
65
detention has ceased
Supreme Court of India
when challenge is made
regarding forfeiture of the property under SAFEMA, the Court is
competent to examine the orders passed ... passed under COFEPOSA Act while
challenging the proceedings initiated under SAFEMA regarding forfeiture
of property, the appellant before the High
Supreme Court of India
incidental prayer quashing the notice issued
under SAFEMA ? Non Supply of copies of material documents
based on which a detention ... under COFEPOSA for holding that
the action taken under SAFEMA is unsustainable. The High
Court of Bombay, accepted the plea
Supreme Court of India
prejudice and damage caused on account of
initiating proceedings under SAFEMA. Strong reliance is
placed on Competent Authority, Ahmedabad ... regard to the consequential action taken at any rate
under SAFEMA. Otherwise it would amount to the Government
concerned being
Supreme Court of India
notice issued under Section 6, the Authority
under SAFEMA passed orders forfeiting the petitioner's
properties under the said ... writ petition challenging the said orders under
SAFEMA (writ petition No. 1487 of 1979). The High Court
dismissed the writ
Supreme Court of India
when challenge is made regarding forfeiture of the
property under SAFEMA, the Court is competent to examine the orders
passed ... passed under COFEPOSA Act while
challenging the proceedings initiated under SAFEMA regarding forfeiture of
property, the appellant before the High
Supreme Court of India
husband of the petitioner. While the proceedings under
SAFEMA were pending, the husband of the petitioner died.
Respondent ... petitioner, which
was a condition precedent to initiate proceedings under
SAFEMA. Reliance was placed on the revocation of the order
Supreme Court of India
Talab Haji Hussein
which gave rise to the proceedings under SAFEMA as sell as
consequential order under SAFEMA since ... High Court of
Gujarat the competent authority functioning under SAFEMA by
order dated 17th March 1987 after hearing the purchaser
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -