Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 96 (0.70 seconds)

grantee. The Marathi equivalent to the term jaghir, namely, saranjam, came in course of time to be applied ... below to the distinction between the term inam and saranjam. The importance has reached this point, that the learned Judges
Bombay High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 13 -
(1912) 14 BOMLR 1226
alleged that he was the saranjamdar of the ancestral saranjam village of Janu where the lands in question were situate ... According to the plaint this is a hereditary saranjam village. Saranjams are held subject to the saranjam rules published
Bombay High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 12 -
(1916) 18 BOMLR 768
- K B Scott
rights in the lands in suit appertain to a Saranjam held on political tenure and that the present incumbent ... Saranjam is the plaintiff. The defendants, however, contend that the Inam rights are merely the right to receive the royal
Bombay High Court
- Cites 2 - Cited by 9 -
(1910) 12 BOMLR 208
- K B Scott
consideration is the nature of the tenure of this Saranjam. The history and origin of this Bagni Saranjam have been ... village of Bagni was held as a personal Saranjam by the family of Venkatrav Bhaskar for a century before
Bombay High Court
- Cites 9 - Cited by 8 -
(1921) ILR 45 Bom 694
- Crump
HIDAYATULLAH, M. CITATION: 1960 AIR 1272 ACT: Saranjam Estate-Maintenance grant to junior member-Power of Government to resume ... Government order of resumption and re-grant-If barred- Saranjam Rules-Bombay Revenue jurisdiction
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 5 - Cited by 5 -
1960 AIR 1272
this appeal, held that that grant was one of Saranjam. I may here mention that Exhibit A was admitted ... accepts the position that in fact this was a Saranjam grant, is contended by Divan Bahadur Rao for the plaintiff
Bombay High Court
- Cites 29 - Cited by 4 -
(1928) 30 BOMLR 1463
- F A C.J.
that we are here concerned with a saranjam property known as the Shendurni estate in Khandesh, This was granted ... present plaintiff, who is now the holder of the saranjam since 1900, is a descendant of the elder son Vasudeo
Bombay High Court
- Cites 7 - Cited by 4 -
(1931) 33 BOMLR 1443
- Baker
Pandurangrao was a Sarva Inam and not a Saranjam and that therefore it was not resumable by Government, but heritable ... even assuming the grant to Pandurangrao to be a Saranjam, the Government could resume what they granted, viz., the royal
Bombay High Court
- Cites 13 - Cited by 3 -
(1917) 19 BOMLR 117
- Shah
records the property in suit as sarva inam political saranjam Class I, descendible to the male heirs of the holders ... defendants Nos. 2 to 8 were members of the saranjam family ; that the plaint village was not a saranjam
Bombay High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 3 -
(1938) 40 BOMLR 400
- Sen
plaintiff appeals. 2. The suit relates to a saranjam estate in the State of Bombay. The plaintiff claims ... present parties was given the Gajendragad estate as a saranjam some time before the advent of the British. When they
Bombay High Court
- Cites 9 - Cited by 3 -
(1952) 54 BOMLR 439
- Bose
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next