1 - 10 of 6946 (0.94 seconds)
hand from which he dictated
to the scribe Chokkanna (P. W. 3) who wrote the will.
After the will ... written the scribe took it to the
adjoining room where Lakshmamma was lying in bed. The will
was then read
Supreme Court of India
attesting wit-
nesses and the third one as the scribe. Harbhajan Lal and
Jawala Prasad Tewari purport to have signed ... person
who has signed it as the scribe. Jawala Prasad Tewari was
admittedly dead when the suit was brought
Supreme Court of India
said rough draft was made fair and was
scribed by Sant Bux, a clerk of Gur Charan ... deed of waqf was also prepared and scribed by one Hasinuddin on the
morning
Supreme Court of India
High Court committed
an error in treating the scribe as an attesting witness
when he did not sign as animo ... Evidence Act. He fairly conceded
that the scribe was not and could not be treated as an
attesting witness
Supreme Court of India
examined 5
witnesses which included Respondent No. 13
himself, Scribe and two attesting witnesses of the
will, hand-writing expert ... entire
evidence present on the record held that the scribe
in his testimony had vividly stated that the will
Supreme Court of India
person who had put his name under the word
scribe was not an attesting witness ... purpose of authenticating that he was a scribe. In
the similar vein, the Privy Council in Shiam Sunder Singh
Supreme Court of India
death by
the defendants with the help of the scribe and the attesting witnesses.
So the only substantial question before ... with the help of the other defendants, the scribe and
the attesting witnesses. In appeal the High Court came
Supreme Court of India
same day. The Will is said to have been
scribed by one Banabehari Upadhyaya (PW-9), an advocate's clerk ... Banabehari Upadhyaya who, as noticed hereinbefore, not only
scribed the Will but also stated himself to be an attesting witness
Supreme Court of India
signed
blank letter heads. PW 1 who is the scribe as well as attesting
witness of the Will was admittedly ... instructions of his senior, the
Will must have been scribed by the junior advocate. Both the
attesting witnesses
Supreme Court of India
favour of Indiramma. Defendant No.1 had examined the scribe of the
Will as DW2 to prove the Will ... Registrar was also not examined. DW2, the
scribe did not anywhere mention that he had attested the Will.
Therefore
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -