1 - 10 of 6233 (3.46 seconds)
alleged user is infringement under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act?
(4) Whether the learned single Judge was right ... which the trade mark is registered. ..."
Section 29 (1) of Trade Marks Act is a general proposition
Madras High Court
Central Government Act Section 29(4)(c) in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
(c) the registered trade mark
Central Government Act
4) of Trade-mark Act.
7. Section 28 of the Trade-mark Act 1999
(hereinafter referred to as the Act ... Act. Section 29 has nine sub-
clauses. Section 29 reads as under:
"29. Infringement of registered
13
trade marks
Bombay High Court
Secundrabad and Hyderabad. So ingredients of Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act was not made out.
(v)Order ... advanced his argument in respect of Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act. Hence, the learned Single Judge himself
Madras High Court
States Courts. The plaintiff relied upon Section 29 (4)
of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and submitted that ... alleged that a bare perusal of section 29 (4) of the Trade Marks Act 1999 would show that it
envisages
Delhi High Court
Law Commission Report The Indian Penal Code Volume 1 LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA
ONE HUNDRED
Law Commission Report
provisions of Section 29(1), 29(2)(b) and 29(4) of the Trade Mark Act,
1999 (hereinafter referred
Bombay High Court
Marks Act, 1999, which is relevant in this regard, reads as
under:-
29(4) A registered trade mark is infringed ... trade mark as a well-known
trade mark including -
(i) the knowledge or recognition of that
trade mark
Delhi High Court
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Indore
Mahesh Niranjan Jut P. Ltd, vs Department Of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Indore
Counsel relied upon the provisions of Section 29 (6) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred ... trade mark is protected by the laws of a country where such trade mark may be registered. Consequently, a trade
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -