1 - 10 of 82620 (5.73 seconds)
Central Government Act Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
27. How much of information received from accused ... inducements, etc., see the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act 5 of 1898 ), s. 343. 2. As to statements made
Central Government Act
Evidence
Act. I express no opinion as to what portion of the statement would be
admissible under Section 27, Evidence ... Act identical with that now contained in Section 1(2). The Legislature
clearly thought that statements admissible under Section 27
Allahabad High Court
Section 162 was wide enough to coyer a statement
which would otherwise have been admissible in evidence under Section 27 ... Evidence Act in the form of Section 27. When he copied Section 150 as
Section 27 of the Evidence
Allahabad High Court
head note of which
reads as follows:
Under Section 27, Evidence Act, not every statement made by a person
accused ... property
in the fields was admissible in evidence under Section 27, Evidence
Act, as it set the Police in motion
Madras High Court
27 of
the Evidence Act into existence. This legislative history is as under:
Before the Indian Evidence Act, which ... Section 27 controls not only Sections 25 and
26 but also controls Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act
Himachal Pradesh High Court
contravention of this Act, or of rules made and
notified under Section 5 or Section 8 possesses opium....shall ... Assam Opium Act.
Section 15, Opium Act, being amended by the Assam Opium (Amendment)
Act, 1933 (Assam Act
Calcutta High Court
convicted the accused for murder under Section 302 IPC and for robbery under Section 392 IPC and sentenced ... look into confession recorded under Section 25 or Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act in order to decide
Madras High Court
suggested that it
is an anomaly that under Section 27 of the Evidence Act statements made
to the Police ... Criminal Procedure Code and
Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. The very basis of the argument
of Ramesam
Madras High Court
misunderstanding. And their Lordships
refused to admit under Section 27 of the Evidence Act Information given
by the accused ... custody of the police
officer was admissible under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, was not
decided in that case
Allahabad High Court
Prasanto gave another
information (Ex.P/82) under Section 27 of the Evidence Act to PW13
Tribhuvan Singh ... Prasanto
gave another information (Ex.P/91) under Section 27 of the Evidence
Act to PW13 Tribhuvan Singh
Rajasthan High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -