1 - 10 of 200217 (8.79 seconds)
Central Government Act Section 8 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
8. Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct ... affect the relevancy of statements under any other section of this Act. Explanation 2.-- When the conduct of any person
Central Government Act
either covered by Section
21 (2) or by Section 8, Evidence Act.
29. Section 21 (2), Evidence Act, provides :
"Admissions ... next consideration is, whether it is admissible under Section
8, Evidence Act. Illustration (e) to Section 8, Evidence Act, says
Himachal Pradesh High Court
evidence in proof at conspiracy has not been seriously
assailed before us. The learned Judge has carefully examined the
evidence ... 8 of 1963 (Orissa) by reference to
some of the Supreme Court decisions also. Under Section 105, Evidence
Act
Orissa High Court
Section, though
it may be relevant as a dying declaration under Section 32, Clause
(I), or as corroborative evidence under ... 8. In a
specific case, it can also be used as a corroborative piece of evidence
under Section 157, Evidence
Himachal Pradesh High Court
appellants
have been convicted under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive
Substances Act, 1908 and have been sentenced ... banned
organization under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
The prosecution further alleges that at the pointing
Delhi High Court
acts of the accused, which is admissible under
Section 8 or any of the preceding sections of the Evidence ... regards production of articles, the evidence is relevant
as evidence of conduct under Section 8, Evidence Act. Under that
section
Allahabad High Court
Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, as amended by the
Amending Act ... amendment of the Finance Act, 1956, and that of the
Amending Act of 1959. It is not the effect
Supreme Court of India
read with Section 5(1)(d) of
the Act and under Section 161, Penal Code.
11. In appeal the High ... appellant, proceeds the argument, was relevant under
Section 8. Evidence Act and was a definite pointer towards his guilt.
Counsel
Supreme Court of India
examination of the
appellant under Section 342, Criminal P. C. Even in his examination
under Section 342 the appellant ... statements in reply are not admissible at all under Section 8, Evidence
Act. If these alleged statements
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Syed Qasim Razvi vs The State Of Hyderabad And ... on 19
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -