section 87 of negotiable instrument act

Central Government Act Section 87 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 87. Effect of material alteration. Alteration by indorsee ... original parties: 1. Ins. by Act 17 of 1934, s. 2. 2. Ins. by Act

Central Government Act

- Cites 0 - Cited by 84

Krushnacharana Padhi, Minor By ... vs Gourochandro Dyano Symanto on 2 August, 1939

having regard to the provisions of Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, it was not possible to found ... Negotiable Instruments Act be assumed to be incorrect can only be declared to be void under Section 87

Madras High Court

- Cites 7 - Cited by 2 -

(1939) 2 MLJ 686

- A Rahman

Bhaskaran Chandrasekharan vs V. Radhakrishnan on 6 April, 1998

material alteration within the meaning of Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. The appellant was the defendant ... that instrument void under Section 87 of the Act. Section 87 is extracted below for easy reference : "87. Effect

Kerala High Court

- Cites 10 - Cited by 4 -

1998 (2) ALD Cri 546

- K Radhakrishnan

Madam Pillai vs Athinarayana Pillai And Anr. on 13 October, 1924

against the first defendant and that Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is no bar, as the 2nd defendant ... material alteration within the meaning of Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He concedes that if the 1st defendant

Madras High Court

- Cites 4 - Cited by 3 -

AIR 1925 Mad 929

- Devadoss

Kandasami Mudaliar vs Muthukrishna Moorthy And Anr. on 1 March, 1993

material alteration within the meaning of Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Therefore, the lower appellate court has dismissed ... within the meaning of that term under Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In this connection, there

Madras High Court

- Cites 21 - Cited by 2 -

(1993) 1 MLJ 672

- A Hadi

Seethalakshmi Ammal vs T.P. Srinivasa Naicker on 9 December, 1992

altered and therefore is hit by Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and hence the suit is liable ... attract the penal provisions of Section 87 of the Indian Negotiable Instruments Act. I entirely agree with this judgment

Madras High Court

- Cites 4 - Cited by 2 -

(1993) 1 MLJ 615

- Bellie

Verco Private Ltd. And Ors. vs Newandram Naraindas And Anr. on 21 December, 1972

Exhibit A-2 and therefore under Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the promissory note could not be said ... first respondent from suing thereon. Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, so far as is relevant, is as follows

Madras High Court

- Cites 5 - Cited by 2 -

(1973) 2 MLJ 92

- M Ismail

Verco Private Ltd., Padi And Ors. vs Newandram Naraindas And Anr. on 21 December, 1972

therefore under Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the promissory note could not be said to have become inoperative ... first respondent from suing thereon. Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, so far as in relevant, is as follows

Madras High Court

- Cites 3 - Cited by 2 -

AIR 1974 Mad 4

Rangaswami Reddi vs K. Doraiswami Reddi on 29 March, 1957

promissory note became void and unenforceable under Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He found against the defendant ... promissory note has income Void (under Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) because of the material alteration and therefore

Madras High Court

- Cites 8 - Cited by 2 -

AIR 1957 Mad 715

- Rajamannar

Santhu Mohideen Pillai ... vs Jamal Mohammad Jamaludin Labbai on 18 July, 1928

material alteration within the meaning of Section 87, Negotiable Instruments Act. The case in Madam Pillai v. Athinarayana Pillai

Madras High Court

- Cites 3 - Cited by 2 -

AIR 1928 Mad 1092

- Wallace

Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -