1 - 10 of 4403 (0.91 seconds)
after the solemnization of the marriage, had voluntary, sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse
Central Government Act
rape" who, except in the case hereinafter excepted, has sexual intercourse with a woman under circumstances falling under ... Explanation.- Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual intercourse necessary to the offence of rape. Exception.- Sexual intercourse
Central Government Act
purposes of this section" illicit intercourse" means sexual intercourse between persons not united by marriage, or by any union
Central Government Act
such party is the husband, that he has had sexual intercourse with any woman outside wedlock
Central Government Act
Indian Penal Code, 1860
497. Adultery.-- Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows ... without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty
Central Government Act
lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall be punished with
Central Government Act
rape on her. Each one of the accused
committed sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix forcibly
and against her will. They ... subjected her to sexual
intercourse once again during the night against her will.
Next morning at about
Supreme Court of India
concurrently held that though the prosecutrix had consented
to sexual intercourse with the appellant, the consent was obtained
by fraud ... deeply in love with the accused, continued to
have sexual intercourse with him till it was discovered that
Supreme Court of India
Explanation.-——Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual intercourse neces-
sary to the offence of rape.
Exception.——Sexual intercourse ... said to commit rape who has sexual intercourse with ll ,
woman, other than his wife-
(a) against her will
Law Commission Report
respondent to the wife showed that there had been sexual
intercourse between the wife and the co-respondent ... however indicate that there must
have been sexual intercourse between the wife and the co-
respondent in 1955. Therefore, there
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -