Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 3025 (1.08 seconds)

house in question cannot be said to be a `shared household' within the meaning of Section ... referred to as the 'Act'). Section 2(s) states: "`shared household` means a household where the person aggrieved lives
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 13 - Cited by 27 - M Katju
India, the wife s right to reside in a shared household is under Section 17 of the Domestic Violence ... runs thus:- 17. Right to reside in a shared household.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other
Bombay High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 3
petitioner should be permitted to reside in the shared household and the officer in charge of the nearest Police Station ... directing the respondent to remove himself from the shared household; Provided that no order under clause (b) shall be passed
Madras High Court
- Cites 13 - Cited by 1
property of the petitioner and it is not a shared household. It is contended that petitioner being a female person ... exclusive property of the petitioner and is not a shared household of respondents 1 and 2 and on that ground
Kerala High Court
- Cites 35 - Cited by 1
contend that the suit property is a shared household as defined under the PWDV Act and thus, defendant ... point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship
Delhi High Court
- Cites 21 - Cited by 0 -
148 (2008) DLT 506
- S K Kaul
point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship ... persons, who have lived together in a shared household and when they are related by consanguinity, marriage or through
Delhi High Court
- Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S N Dhingra
from obstructing the respondent-wife to reside in a shared household. FACTUAL MATRIX: -------------- 3. The petitioner and respondent got married ... Petitioner and started residing with him in the shared household. The continuous acrimony between them resulted in matrimonial discord, leading
Bombay High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0
joint family having domestic relationship with Applicant in a shared household. Respondent No. 4 to 6 have never resided even ... That is to infer that Applicant resided in a shared household in a purported domestic relationship with the Respondent
Delhi High Court
- Cites 19 - Cited by 0
residence of a wife in the matrimonial home, shared-household or some other place. 2. This appeal is directed against ... plaintiff‟s husband, namely, the defendant No.1 has no share and / or interest in the same." Again in para
Delhi High Court
- Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - B D Ahmed
respondent of the said flat as a shared household. A relief was also sought under section 19 of the said ... possession of the appellant/applicant-wife from the share household i.e- the said flat, during the pendency
Bombay High Court
- Cites 30 - Cited by 0
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next