1 - 10 of 1233 (0.91 seconds)
Supreme Court of India
Waman Rao And Ors vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors
Supreme Court of India
Tribunals under the Act and therefore, the doctrine of
stare decisis should be applied and Sohan Lal decision be upheld ... Halsbury's Laws of England, the principle of stare decisis is
stated thus: "The decision which has been followed
Supreme Court of India
estate-Such property, if ancestral
qua his sons-Stare decisis-Rule, when inapplicable.
HEADNOTE:
Under the customary ... approved.
The rule of stare decisis is not an inflexible rule and is
inapplicable where the decision is clearly erroneous
Supreme Court of India
legal position with
regard to them.
The Doctrine of Stare Decisis
9) It is a settled principle of law that ... long time, should not be unsettled. The doctrine of stare decisis
is expressed in the maxim "stare decisis
Supreme Court of India
this score also
that reliance on the doctrine of `stare decisis' may be
apposite. While it is true that ... explained the scope of the
doctrine of stare decisis with reference to Halsbury's Laws
of England and Corpus Juris
Supreme Court of India
necessitated a detailed study of the concept of stare decisis.
13. Bhavnagar University ?vs- Palitana Sugar Mills
Delhi High Court
unamended
Articles 31C of the Constitution-Doctrine of stare decisis,
applicability to Articles 31A & 31B-House of the People ... cannot be upheld by
applying the doctrine of stare decisis, though the Article
has continued to be recognised as valid
Supreme Court of India
Bombay High Court
Venkanna Narasinha vs Laxmi Sannappa on 20 November, 1950 Equivalent citations: AIR
Bombay High Court
Karnataka High Court
Muniswamy Gowda H. vs Management Of Ksrtc And Another on 10 January
Karnataka High Court
Full Bench had erred in ignoring the
doctrine of stare decisis, inasmuch as the provision had
received consistent interpretation
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -