1 - 10 of 133237 (4.54 seconds)
earmarked for a park. The Rajasthan Housing Board filed a reply
stating, inter alia, that there was a temple ... remove the same. The Jaipur Municipal
Corporation also filed a reply stating, inter alia, that on 9.11.1992 the
charge
Supreme Court of India
reply has been filed by the Income-tax Officer in which he
states that the notice in question ... Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi. She filed a reply stating
that the notice was neither lawful not valid
Rajasthan High Court
return to this petition was filed. It has
been stated in the reply that petitioner's application dated ... this habeas corpus petition. The State has also filed reply stating
that the petitioner is serving sentence awarded
Rajasthan High Court
filed on behalf of the State Board, wherein it is asserted
that the State Board lad advised the State Government ... which reference has been made
in reply filed on behalf of the State Board, is the letter dated April
Rajasthan High Court
notice, the respondents entered appearance and the State
filed reply wherein the stand taken by the State was that
GAMS ... evil in
concerned colleges in the State of Bihar and hence the
State Government was given control in the matter
Supreme Court of India
appellant filed the aforesaid writ petition. The respondents filed
reply stating therein that the provisions of Section ... Municipality or State
Government subject to the contention of restraining its use for a
particular purpose, the State Government
Rajasthan High Court
reply. It was filed on 14th January 1999. In Para-13 of this
reply it was stated that the relationship ... none of the respondents had filed any reply till then. As
stated earlier, at that time only the first five
Bombay High Court
applicant
will completely oust the respondent. Accordingly it was stated that the
withdrawal was wholly misconceived. Partner of the respondent ... seeking review was opposed by the appellant, who
filed reply stating that Shri Kareer was competent in law to withdraw
Delhi High Court
appellant company. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. filed reply
stating therein that the applicant company has not made out any case ... also stated that the amount awarded is
excessive.
25. Driver Kartar Singh appeared as RW 1. He stated that
Himachal Pradesh High Court
pattern On
28.09.1982 reference was made by State Government under Section 4-K of
U.P. Industrial Dispute Act (hereinafter ... petitioner filed reply stating
therein that the application under Section 33-C(2) of the Act was not
maintainable
Allahabad High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -