1 - 10 of 1887 (1.31 seconds)
defendant No. 11 Sri S. P.
Singh was transposed as a plaintiff. On 13th March, 1978, the
transposed plaintiff ... heirs of defendant No. 10.
Defendant No. 11 (the transposed plaintiff) also filed an application
to exempt the plaintiffs from
Patna High Court
herein) filed on behalf of respondent No. 3 for transposing him as
appellant.
2. An election petition under Section ... defeatedkcandidate on January 6, 1983 that he may be transposed as
the appellant in place of respondent
Rajasthan High Court
filed by the 8th respondent in the appeal to
transpose him as the 3rd appellant in the second appeal ... filed C. M. P. 13306 of 1979 to transpose him as the 3rd
appellant in the second appeal. This petition
Madras High Court
Procedure, 1908 ('CPC' for brevity)
praying this Court to transpose him as appellant in the place of the
original appellant ... legitimate claim. Therefore, the second respondent
prays to transpose him as appellant and complete adjudication of all
questions involved
Andhra High Court
them in I.A.No. 84 of
1985 for transposing them as plaintiffs 2 and 3 in the suit ... were given up long before the petition for
transposing them as plaintiffs 2 and 3 was filed.
6. Veluswamy, learned
Madras High Court
Prakash Agarwall and Shri Ajit Kr. Agarwall, subsequently transposed as
petitioners, granted by the Government in respect ... assignors, the respondent Nos, 6 and 7 (the transposed petitioners) and
the notice of the Collector taking possession
Calcutta High Court
filed I.A.No. 1676
of 2002, for transposing them as plaintiffs 2 to 4. The trial court
allowed ... Consequent upon the respondents 1 to 3 being transposed as
plaintiffs, they filed I.A.No. 1564 of 2003, seeking
Andhra High Court
Respondent No. 2 has made this Civil Application for
transposing him as the appellant in case the appellant is permitted ... opposed
the application made by respondent No 2 for transposing him as the
appellant. In order to appreciate the rival
Gujarat High Court
pursuing the suit, the Court ought to have transposed her
as the plaintiff and transposed plaintiff as a defendant ... action
against such plaintiff, may be allowed to be transposed as plaintiff
in the suit........"
"Where an application simpliciter
Karnataka High Court
filed his objection
and prayed that he may be transposed as plaintiff.
4-A. The Court below by order ... Order 23, the petitioner should be
transposed as plaintiff and opposite party No. 1 should be transposed
as defendant
Patna High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -