1 - 10 of 3475 (1.04 seconds)
Court, when one of the
Petitioners was produced on video conference and the rest of the
petitioners were not produced ... through Video Conference and the case was
adjourned to 5.5.2005. There is no dispute on the fact that on this
Bombay High Court
within a reasonable period but willing to testify, a
Video Conference may be arranged as held by the Supreme Court ... evidence can be recorded on Commission by way
of Video Conference. It was held as follows:-
"Recording of evidence
Kerala High Court
Delhi and the trial was being
conducted in Patna, video conference facilities be provided
to the appellant in order ... this court that notwithstanding the fact that the video
conference facility was out of order the court should go
ahead
Supreme Court of India
following were present
Appellant: Mr. Rashad M. Shaikh on video conference from NIC-PUNE Studio;
Respondent: Mr. A. M. Bhosle ... RPFC-II on video conference from NIC-PUNE Studio;
Mr. Khune, Assistant PF Commissioner;
"The PIO admits that
Central Information Commission
State, out of which with respect to 13 jails Video
Conference System between concerned jails and Courts is provided ... which in 9 Districts / jails Video Conference System is
functioning and now with respect to Mehsana District Court, Lajpor
(Surat
Gujarat High Court
that there is no
method of assessing cost of video conference facility but it
has been suggested in the report ... person or party concerned at whose instance the
video conference facility is to be availed in the Court
proceedings
Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
examined and their evidence to be recorded through video
conference. The question of holding the video conference cannot and does ... same must not be allowed to file after holding video
conference for recording evidence of the petitioners.
Mr. Sanjib Dawn
Calcutta High Court
examined and their evidence to be recorded through video
conference. The question of holding the video conference cannot and does ... same must not be allowed to file after holding video
conference for recording evidence of the petitioners.
Mr. Sanjib Dawn
Calcutta High Court
cross-examine such doctors or experts,
there can be video conferences or asking questions by arranging
telephone conference ... should be borne
by the person who claims such video conference. Further, cross-
examination can be taken by the Commissioner
Supreme Court of India
extended till 1.4.2005 by producing the accused through video
conference and on the expiry of the extended remand ... accused was not produced through video conference and therefore, the
next hearing was fixed on 15.4.2005, but the detaining authority
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -