1 - 10 of 40377 (0.44 seconds)
basis of floor
area, it was held, was violative of article 14 of the
Constitution as it would ... High Court also declared section 406(2) (e) violative of
article 14. Part of rule 42 which related to distress
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar, Etc. ... vs State Of Gujarat And Another, Etc
Supreme Court of India
accept the argument
based on the violation of rights under Articles 14 and 21 of
the Constitution or based ... adjudicating
authority and pursue it in accordance with law.
14. Considerable arguments were put forward by
learned counsel
Supreme Court of India
hours (excluding lunch break). This, it was
alleged, violates Article 14 of Constitution.
8. The appellant ... According to the appellants, this is discriminatory and violates Article
14 of the Constitution. The appellants also claim that this
Supreme Court of India
Item 80 was
arbitrary, discriminatory and not only violated
Article 14 but also the basic structure of the
Constitution ... that Section 3 insofar as
forests are concerned violated Articles 14, 19 and 31
of the Constitution. Be that
Supreme Court of India
Prohibition Act violative of Articles 14 and 19
of the Constitution of India?
(ii) Are the impugned provisions ... founded, inter alia, on the ground of
violation of Article 14. The Central Government claimed protection of
Article
Andhra High Court
Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act,
1965 violate Article 14 of the Constitution ?"
5. The petitions were then listed before ... ordinary procedure under the general law, the special law violates
Article 14. The Supreme Court has in numerous cases struck
Allahabad High Court
that the provisions of the
said Acts are violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of
India ... said provisions on the
ground they are violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the
Constitution. Petitioners
Karnataka High Court
benefit of the
general public and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution
of India. It is not correct ... persons are treated unlike -- and so, the Act violates Article 14 of
the Constitution. This plea
Kerala High Court
which is arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Article 14 besides operating as an unreasonable restriction of Article ... contended that the impugned provision violates Article 265, 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -