1 - 10 of 259112 (6.73 seconds)
Bhagwan Rajak were
not made parties, who were necessary parties to the writ
petition, the High Court was justified ... writ
the said tribunal or authority is the only necessary party
and the Parties An Whose favour the said tribunal
Supreme Court of India
Impleadment of party by Court to a suit
as necessary party-Necessary to proper party-Who is-
Distinction between necessary ... unauthorised-Lessee
seeking impleadment as additional defendant as necessary
party- Whether Court could direct plaintiff to add lessee as
defendant
Supreme Court of India
decision in the suit and therefore it was a necessary party and in any
event a proper party ... suit
property and therefore the appellant was neither a necessary party nor a
proper party to the suit
Supreme Court of India
also filed applications for being impleaded as a party in the
appeals filed by the land owners in this Court ... them in making a fair
determination. Such protection was necessary because in the matter of
acquisition under the Land Acquisition
Supreme Court of India
test always must be,
is the addition of the party necessary to make the
adjudication itself effective and enforceable ... alleged that M/s Hindustan Steel
Ltd. was a necessary party, because the material documents
which may have
Supreme Court of India
would clearly show that the
necessary parties in a suit for specific performance of a contract for
sale ... liabilities of the parties. A
purchaser is a necessary party as he would be affected if he had
purchased with
Supreme Court of India
Scope of Practice-Necessary parties-Who are.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant in a suit against respondents claimed recovery
of possession ... brothers made the suit incompetent for
non-joinder of necessary parties. The trial court dismissed
the suit. On appeal
Supreme Court of India
against the remaining respondents as G was not a necessary
party, and (ii) the decree of the trial court could ... sustain the argument that the
vendor is not a necessary party when, according to the view
accepted by this Court
Supreme Court of India
claim- Creditors
who did not take active steps-Whether necessary parties.
HEADNOTE:
Creditors who did not take an active part ... proceedings
are not necessary parties to an appeal from an order
rejecting a claim made in a proceeding under section
Supreme Court of India
that to this petition the
Central Government is a necessary party, and, therefore, this Court has
jurisdiction to entertain this ... petition. If the Central Government is a
necessary party to this petition, then this Court would have
jurisdiction to entertain
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -