Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 27767 docs - [View All]
Minor Subir Ranjan Mondal vs Sita Nath Mukherjee on 14 May, 1993
Smt. Uma Bai vs Union Of India on 18 May, 2017
Sethuramachar vs The Mysore Kirloskar Ltd on 19 November, 2013
Kesharibhai Jesingbhai vs Bai Lilavati And Ors. on 7 February, 1962
Mohammad Sagir vs Bharat Heavy Electricals And Ors. on 24 February, 2004

[Complete Act]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963
5 Extension of prescribed period in certain cases. —Any appeal or any application, other than an application under any of the provisions of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), may be admitted after the prescribed period, if the appellant or the applicant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period. Explanation.— The fact that the appellant or the applicant was misled by any order, practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may be sufficient cause within the meaning of this section.