Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 383 docs - [View All]
Fatten Lall vs Gujju Lall on 1 June, 1880
Pushpa Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Learned Adj ... on 23 July, 2015
Ibne Hasan vs Smt. Hasina Bibi And Ors. on 31 January, 1984
State Of Bihar vs Radha Krishna Singh & Ors on 20 April, 1983
City Municipal Council vs C. Ramu on 13 July, 1988

[Complete Act]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 40 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
40. Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial.—The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Courts from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit, or to hold such trial.